Skip to main content

Security report for entretiming.pl

ENTRE Timing · Other · Poland

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

45/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

ENTRE Timing is a Polish small business specializing in electronic timing services for sports events. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image focused on event timing, results publication, and related additional services. The target audience is primarily local sports event organizers and participants. The business operates on a service model with a niche market position in Poland, founded around 2013. Technically, the website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern plugin stack including WooCommerce, Yoast SEO, and Google Analytics integration, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly, though accessibility features are basic. From a security perspective, the website uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent mechanisms, reflecting GDPR compliance efforts. However, no advanced security headers or explicit security policies are present, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is publicly available. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy, but the website content and technical setup suggest a legitimate small business presence. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for improvement in security best practices and transparency. The website is fully accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms, providing a good user experience with clear navigation and relevant content. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security and incident response policies, and adding vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to improve trust and compliance. These steps will strengthen the security posture and business credibility while maintaining a positive user experience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching entretiming.pl

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
45

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

ENTRE Timing operates in the niche market of electronic timing for sports events in Poland. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized timing technology and event management services. The business model is service-oriented, targeting sports event organizers and participants. Revenue streams likely include timing service fees and additional event-related services. The company maintains a modest partnership ecosystem, including a website creator (Sztuka Kadru) and uses third-party marketing tools like Mailchimp. Growth indicators are limited but the consistent branding and active social media presence on Facebook suggest ongoing engagement with its target market. The company appears to focus on local market penetration rather than broad expansion.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options indicates potential exposure to common web vulnerabilities. No public security or incident response policies are found, and no dedicated contact channels for security incidents exist. The absence of a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure program limits transparency and responsiveness to security issues. Overall, while no critical vulnerabilities are evident, the security posture would benefit from adopting recognized best practices and improving public security communication.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to enhance transparency and preparedness.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and add a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Regularly update all WordPress plugins and themes to minimize exposure to known vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security audits to maintain compliance and improve user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
ENTRE Timing
Description
Elektroniczny pomiar czasu
Key services
Electronic timing for sports events, Event results publication, Additional services related to timing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, Yoast SEO, Slider Revolution, WooCommerce, Contact Form 7, Form Maker, Mailchimp for WooCommerce, Google Maps API, Twitter Widgets
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Mailchimp for WooCommerce
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is primarily in Polish language targeting local audience.
  3. Site uses WordPress CMS with common plugins for SEO, forms, and e-commerce.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found in the homepage HTML; contact likely via contact page.
  5. Cookie consent banner present indicating GDPR compliance efforts.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No privacy policy page explicitly named but RODO page likely serves this purpose.
  8. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  9. No terms of service or security policy pages found.
  10. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a range of popular plugins such as WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, Yoast SEO for search engine optimization, Contact Form 7 and Form Maker for form management, and Mailchimp integration for marketing. The use of Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager indicates active user behavior tracking. The site loads external resources from trusted domains including Google Fonts, Google Maps API, and Twitter widgets. Performance is moderate with mobile optimization in place. However, no advanced hosting provider information is available. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and improved accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with entretiming.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review entretiming.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.