Skip to main content

Security report for enreach.lv

Enreach Latvia · Telecommunications · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enreach Latvia is a regional telecommunications and IT solutions provider offering a range of business communication services including unified communications, business telephony systems, call automation, and contact center solutions. The company targets businesses in Latvia seeking professional IT and telecommunication support. The website is professionally designed, mobile-optimized, and integrates modern analytics and tracking tools such as Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel. A cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR is implemented, enhancing privacy compliance. However, explicit privacy policy and terms of service pages were not found in the provided content, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but lacks visible security headers and vulnerability disclosure information. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the website presents a professional and trustworthy business presence with room for improvement in compliance and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enreach.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enreach Latvia operates as a B2B telecommunications and IT service provider under the parent company Enreach. Their market positioning is focused on delivering comprehensive communication solutions to businesses in Latvia, including voice, internet, customer service, and sales support technologies. The company leverages modern digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement and service delivery. The absence of explicit contact information and legal pages in the analyzed content suggests potential areas for enhancing customer trust and regulatory compliance. The company appears to maintain a consistent brand identity and targets medium-sized business clients within the telecommunications sector.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS encryption and integrates Google reCAPTCHA to protect form submissions, indicating a baseline security posture. Cookie consent management via Cookiebot demonstrates awareness of GDPR requirements. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which could hinder timely reporting and mitigation of security issues. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully assess domain legitimacy and ownership transparency. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with clear opportunities for enhancement in headers, policies, and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer or main navigation.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incidents, including a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  4. Create and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enreach Latvia
Description
Enreach Latvia is a full-service IT and telecommunications solutions provider. Their team consists of qualified specialists ready to support businesses in all technical matters.
Key services
Unified communications, Business telephony systems, Call automation, Contact center solutions, Customer service and sales support, SMS API, Voice and internet connectivity
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Font Awesome 6, Google Fonts (Roboto Condensed), Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Cookiebot
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for form submission
  • Cookie consent with GDPR compliance settings

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Facebook Pixel
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is business-focused, targeting telecommunications and IT services in Latvia.
  3. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in the provided HTML.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via Cookiebot with GDPR compliance settings.
  5. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack including Font Awesome 6 for icons, Google Fonts for typography, and integrates multiple third-party analytics and marketing tools such as Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel. Google reCAPTCHA is used for form security. The site is mobile-optimized and employs cookie consent management via Cookiebot, indicating a focus on privacy compliance. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS or hosting provider information was detected in the provided content. The absence of visible security headers and WHOIS data are technical gaps that should be addressed to improve security posture and domain legitimacy verification.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enreach.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enreach.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.