Skip to main content

Security report for enlabs.com

Enlabs AB · Other · Sweden

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

72/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Enlabs AB is a Swedish company operating as part of Entain plc, focusing on the Baltics and Nordics regions. The website primarily serves as a corporate and career portal, linking to both regional and global career opportunities. The business is positioned as a subsidiary within the gaming and entertainment sector, targeting professionals seeking employment within this industry. The website content is professionally presented with consistent branding and clear messaging about the company's affiliation with Entain plc. Technically, the website uses modern front-end technologies such as Tailwind CSS and Google Fonts, ensuring good mobile responsiveness and a clean design. However, there is limited evidence of advanced technical frameworks or CMS platforms. Performance appears moderate with basic SEO and accessibility features implemented. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected in the provided HTML content. From a security perspective, the domain is well protected with multiple EPP status locks, indicating good domain management practices. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, and no security headers or explicit security policies are published on the site. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, which impacts compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Contact information is limited to corporate emails, with no phone numbers or physical addresses provided. No forms or data collection mechanisms were found on the main page. Overall, the website presents a moderate security posture with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices. The domain registration details are consistent with the business claims, supporting legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, publishing privacy and cookie policies, implementing security headers, and establishing incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
58/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching enlabs.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
98
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
58
Average
72

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Enlabs AB operates as a subsidiary of Entain plc, a major global player in the gaming and betting industry. The company focuses on the Baltics and Nordics markets, providing career opportunities and corporate information. The business model centers on employment and regional presence within the larger Entain group. The website targets job seekers and professionals interested in gaming and entertainment careers. The partnership ecosystem includes Entain plc, evidenced by linked career sites. The company has a medium size profile with a history dating back to 2010. The website content is consistent with corporate branding and market positioning, though it lacks extensive marketing or customer engagement features.

Security posture

The security maturity level is moderate. The domain is secured with multiple EPP locks preventing unauthorized transfers or deletions, which is a positive indicator. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which could expose DNS to spoofing attacks. The website lacks security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are standard best practices. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available, limiting transparency and readiness. No forms or input fields reduce attack surface but also limit user engagement. Overall, the security posture is adequate but requires enhancements to meet modern compliance and protection standards.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to enhance GDPR compliance.
  3. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to protect users.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies.
  5. Add contact phone numbers and physical address information to improve trust and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Enlabs AB
Description
Enlabs AB is now part of Entain plc, operating in the Baltics & Nordics region. The website promotes career opportunities in these regions and globally via Entain plc.
Key services
Career opportunities, Corporate information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Tailwind CSS, Google Fonts (Mulish), HTML5
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientTransferProhibited and other EPP locks

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found on the main page.
  3. Contact emails are corporate and relevant.
  4. No phone numbers or physical addresses found on the page.
  5. No forms detected on the main page.
  6. No social media links detected.
  7. No security headers or explicit security policies published.
  8. Website uses modern CSS framework (Tailwind) and Google Fonts.
  9. Domain is secured with multiple EPP status locks but DNSSEC is not enabled.
  10. Website content focuses on corporate and career information.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Tailwind CSS and Google Fonts, ensuring a responsive and visually appealing design. The HTML structure is valid and semantic, supporting accessibility at a basic level. No CMS or backend technologies are evident from the provided content. Performance is moderate, with no heavy scripts or tracking detected. SEO optimization is basic, with minimal meta tags and no structured data or Open Graph tags. The absence of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal user data collection. Technical risks include lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers, which could expose the site to certain attacks. Modernization opportunities include adding structured data, improving SEO, and enhancing accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with enlabs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review enlabs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.