Skip to main content

Security report for englisch.at

Englisch Dekor · Manufacturing · Austria

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Englisch Dekor is a well-established Austrian company specializing in the manufacturing and supply of flame-retardant furniture fabrics, curtains, and decorative textiles primarily for the hospitality, gastronomy, and healthcare sectors. With a history dating back to 1866, the company holds a leading position in the European market, offering a wide range of functional and sustainable textile solutions. Their business model focuses on B2B sales supported by a comprehensive global network of sales representatives and an online webshop. Technically, the website is built on TYPO3 CMS and hosted on Apache servers managed by internex.at. The site features modern interactive elements such as global contact maps and language selection, with good mobile optimization and accessibility. However, performance metrics indicate slow loading times, which could be improved. From a security perspective, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and does not support modern TLS protocols, which is a critical vulnerability. While several security headers are present, the absence of HTTPS significantly impacts the overall security posture. The site implements a cookie consent mechanism with detailed cookie information, indicating good privacy compliance. Contact information is comprehensive and includes multiple regional sales contacts. Overall, the website is professionally designed and content-rich, reflecting a mature business with strong market presence. However, the lack of proper SSL/TLS configuration poses a significant risk that should be addressed promptly to ensure secure communications and maintain trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching englisch.at

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
65
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Englisch Dekor operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on flame-retardant textiles for commercial and healthcare environments. Their competitive advantage lies in their extensive product range, long-standing market presence, and strong European leadership. The company leverages a B2B business model with direct sales and an online webshop, supported by a global network of regional sales representatives. Their partnerships with various international distributors and sales agents enhance their market reach. Growth indicators include a broad geographic presence and a diversified product portfolio emphasizing sustainability and innovation. The company maintains professional branding and consistent messaging across channels, reinforcing their credibility and trustworthiness.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of the website is low due to the absence of a valid SSL certificate and lack of support for modern TLS protocols. This exposes the site to risks such as data interception and undermines user trust. While security headers like HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options are implemented, the critical missing HTTPS layer significantly reduces the security posture. No explicit incident response or security policies are found on the site. Privacy compliance is well-handled with a detailed cookie consent mechanism and a comprehensive privacy policy. The site lacks OCSP stapling and session resumption, which are recommended for improved security and performance. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues is essential to mitigate business impact.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable and enforce modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 and TLS 1.3) to ensure secure communications.
  3. Implement OCSP stapling to enhance certificate revocation checking and reduce latency.
  4. Enable session resumption mechanisms such as session tickets or session cache to improve performance and security.
  5. Develop and publish explicit security and incident response policies to enhance transparency and preparedness.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust TYPO3 CMS platform with Apache web server hosting. It employs modern JavaScript frameworks such as Alpine.js for interactivity and includes a comprehensive global contact map feature. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices including meta tags and Open Graph data. However, performance is currently slow, possibly due to lack of SSL and session optimizations. The technical stack is mature but requires updates to security protocols and certificate management to meet current standards and improve user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with englisch.at. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review englisch.at.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.