Skip to main content

Security report for energy.gov

U.S. Department of Energy · Government · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

83/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The U.S. Department of Energy website serves as the official digital presence of a major federal government agency focused on energy policy, scientific research, and national security. The site provides comprehensive information on energy topics, national laboratories, and government initiatives, targeting a broad audience including the general public, researchers, and policymakers. The website demonstrates a high level of professionalism, consistent branding, and clear navigation, reflecting its authoritative status. Technically, the site is built on Drupal CMS with modern web technologies and integrates analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Microsoft Clarity. It is optimized for mobile devices and accessibility, ensuring broad usability. Security is robust with HTTPS enforced, multiple security headers, and clear privacy and vulnerability disclosure policies, indicating a mature security posture. Overall, the website is trustworthy and well-maintained, with no detected vulnerabilities or suspicious content. The lack of WHOIS data is typical for .gov domains and does not detract from the site's legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include maintaining security best practices, updating third-party scripts, and enhancing incident response communications to further strengthen trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching energy.gov

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
97
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
83

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention energy.gov, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
833
Employees
0
Customers
792
Third parties
41
Weak passwords
9%

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for energy.gov.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Department of Energy operates as a key federal agency with a broad mandate covering energy policy, scientific innovation, and national security. Its market position is unique as a government entity with authoritative influence over energy-related matters. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on public policy, research facilitation, and information dissemination. The agency maintains a network of subsidiaries including national laboratories and specialized administrations, enhancing its operational reach. The website supports these functions by providing detailed content, outreach, and engagement channels, reflecting a mature digital ecosystem aligned with government standards.

Security posture

The website exhibits a strong security posture with enforced HTTPS, comprehensive security headers, and no visible vulnerabilities. Privacy policies and a vulnerability disclosure program demonstrate compliance with federal standards and best practices. The use of reputable analytics and tracking tools is balanced with privacy considerations. No exposed sensitive data or insecure forms were detected. Incident response mechanisms are in place, though continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to maintain resilience against emerging threats.

Recommendations

  1. Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  2. Keep all third-party libraries and analytics scripts up to date to mitigate supply chain risks.
  3. Enhance transparency and communication channels for incident response and vulnerability reporting.
  4. Regularly review and update privacy and cookie policies to align with evolving regulations.
  5. Invest in continuous accessibility improvements to maintain compliance and user inclusivity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
U.S. Department of Energy
Description
U.S. Department of Energy - Home. The Department of Energy is committed to restoring America’s energy dominance and pioneering future energy technologies.
Key services
Energy policy development, Scientific research, Energy security, Public information and outreach, National laboratories management
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 8, Drupal 10, Font Awesome 6 Pro, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity, JavaScript ES6+
Frameworks
Drupal CMS
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
90/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure forms with proper input types
  • Privacy and vulnerability disclosure policies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official U.S. government website with .gov TLD
  2. Comprehensive content about energy policy and research
  3. Strong branding and consistent design
  4. Multiple social media and official government links
  5. Secure HTTPS with modern security headers
  6. Use of reputable analytics and tracking tools with privacy considerations
  7. Accessible and mobile-optimized design
  8. Clear privacy, cookie, and vulnerability disclosure policies
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages Drupal CMS with modern front-end technologies including Font Awesome and JavaScript frameworks. It integrates multiple analytics platforms for user behavior insights and performance monitoring. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with structured navigation and SEO-friendly metadata. Performance is moderate, with opportunities to optimize loading times further. The technical infrastructure aligns with federal hosting and security standards, supporting a reliable and scalable digital presence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 80/100Low17 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with energy.gov. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review energy.gov.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.