Skip to main content

Security report for empica.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS and Security headers.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.empica.com appears to be a minimal or placeholder site built on the Wix platform, with no substantive business content or contact information. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises significant concerns about the legitimacy and trustworthiness of the domain. Technically, the site uses standard Wix scripts and polyfills but lacks advanced security headers or privacy compliance mechanisms. There is no visible privacy policy, cookie consent, or terms of service, which indicates poor privacy compliance. The security posture is weak due to missing security headers and lack of HTTPS verification in the provided data. Overall, the site scores low on content quality, business credibility, and privacy compliance, suggesting it is either under development or not a legitimate business presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching empica.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
69
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention empica.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for empica.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of business-related content, contact details, or WHOIS registration data, it is not possible to ascertain the market positioning, business model, or target audience of the entity behind www.empica.com. The site does not display any trust indicators such as certifications, testimonials, or partnerships. No external business relationships or related domains were identified. The absence of these elements suggests the business intelligence profile is minimal and the domain may not be actively used for commercial purposes.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. There is no evidence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options. The WHOIS data is unavailable, which is a red flag for domain legitimacy. No incident response or security policy information is provided. The site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which is a compliance concern. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected beyond Wix standard scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. The site does not appear to be protected by a Web Application Firewall (WAF). Overall, the security maturity level is low, and the site is vulnerable to trust and compliance issues.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is publicly available or justified if privacy-protected.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with GDPR compliance.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails, phone numbers, and physical addresses.
  4. Enhance security by enabling HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration and adding security headers.
  5. Improve website content quality and professionalism to build trust and credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Wix, JavaScript, Intl.Segmenter Polyfill, Core-js, Focus-within Polyfill
Platforms
Wix.com
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with standard Wix scripts and assets
  2. No WHOIS registration data available for domain www.empica.com
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses detected
  5. No social media or external business links detected
  6. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected
  7. Content is minimal and mostly technical Wix boilerplate with no substantive business information
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Wix standard scripts
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected
  10. Website appears incomplete or placeholder with poor content quality
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Wix and uses Wix's standard JavaScript libraries and polyfills. The site includes polyfills for Intl.Segmenter and uses core-js and focus-within polyfills for legacy browser support. The site lacks advanced frameworks or custom technologies. Performance is moderate given the Wix platform overhead. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal but present. SEO optimization is poor due to missing meta tags and lack of structured data. The site does not include analytics or marketing tools beyond Wix's default scripts. Technical debt appears low but the site is underdeveloped and lacks critical business and security features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with empica.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review empica.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.