Skip to main content

Security report for emmamuseum.fi

Espoon taidemuseosäätiö sr · Other · Finland

Low risk. 1 critical or high finding in GDPR outside view.

Security score

80/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Espoon taidemuseosäätiö sr operates EMMA, Finland's largest modern art museum, offering a rich program of exhibitions, events, and educational activities. The museum targets a broad audience interested in contemporary art and design, positioning itself as a key cultural institution in Espoo and Finland. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, multilingual support, and active social media engagement. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools, hosted on Azure DNS infrastructure. Security posture is strong with HTTPS, security headers, and cookie consent mechanisms, though formal security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly documented. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and trustworthy, supporting the museum's public and cultural mission.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching emmamuseum.fi

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
80
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
80

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The museum operates as a non-profit cultural entity with a focus on modern art exhibitions and community engagement. Its market position as the largest modern art museum in Finland provides competitive advantage and brand recognition. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, venue rentals, shop sales, and public funding. The website supports multiple languages, indicating an international visitor focus. Partnerships with platforms like Finna and EMMA Zone enhance its ecosystem. The museum's digital strategy includes event promotion, educational outreach, and visitor services, reflecting a well-rounded operational model.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with enforced HTTPS, multiple security headers, and no visible exposure of sensitive data. Cookie consent is implemented in compliance with GDPR. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response information limits transparency. Google Analytics is present but not fully configured, which may impact data governance. No known vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected. Recommendations include publishing formal security and incident response policies and considering a vulnerability disclosure program to enhance trust and preparedness.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and user data handling.
  2. Add clear incident response contact information to facilitate reporting and response.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Complete configuration of Google Analytics to ensure accurate and compliant data collection.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie consent and privacy mechanisms to maintain GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Espoon taidemuseosäätiö sr
Registration number
1784691-8
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Espoon taidemuseosäätiö sr
Description
EMMA on taiteen voimasta syntyvien kokemusten ja tilallisten elämysten taidemuseo. Meillä on aina esillä designia ja nykytaidetta.
Key services
Art exhibitions, Events and workshops, Educational programs, Museum shop, Venue rentals
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, MonsterInsights, Hotjar, Enzuzo Cookie Consent
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent implemented
  • No vulnerable libraries detected

Analytics and tracking

Services
Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Marketing tools
MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content.
  2. Strong SEO and structured data implementation.
  3. Comprehensive exhibitions and event information.
  4. Clear contact and location details.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy present and GDPR compliant.
  6. No signs of phishing, malware, or suspicious activity.
  7. No explicit security policy or incident response page found.
  8. Google Analytics is present but not fully configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by WordPress with Yoast SEO and integrates Google Tag Manager and Hotjar for analytics and user behavior tracking. Hosting uses Microsoft Azure DNS services, indicating reliable infrastructure. The site is mobile-optimized with good accessibility features and excellent SEO metadata including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data. Performance is moderate, with potential for optimization in image loading and script management. No deprecated or vulnerable libraries were detected. Overall, the technical implementation supports a professional and user-friendly experience aligned with the museum's goals.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with emmamuseum.fi. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review emmamuseum.fi.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.