Skip to main content

Security report for ember.london

Non Gamstop Casinos - OXON AA · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website oxonaa.org.uk operates as an affiliate and informational platform focusing on non Gamstop casinos for UK players. It provides casino reviews, guides, and affiliate links to various offshore casinos, targeting adult UK gamblers seeking alternatives to Gamstop self-exclusion. The site is built on WordPress with modern SEO and performance optimizations, including Yoast SEO and WP Rocket, and uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The domain is very new, registered in 2025, which aligns with the site's recent content but may raise trust concerns for some users. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks published privacy, cookie, or security policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, and the site content is fully accessible and safe for adult audiences interested in gambling. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and clearer business contact information.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ember.london

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Oxonaa.org.uk positions itself in a niche market serving UK players looking for non Gamstop casinos, a segment that seeks freedom from UKGC restrictions. The business model is primarily affiliate marketing, earning commissions from casino referrals. The site emphasizes honest, no-fluff reviews and practical advice on payments and withdrawals. Its competitive advantage lies in targeting a specific audience with detailed, up-to-date content and a straightforward user experience. The presence of social media links suggests some engagement with the community. However, the new domain age and lack of transparent registrant data may limit perceived credibility. The site does not appear to have parent or subsidiary companies and operates as a small entity focused on content and affiliate revenue.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and employs best practices like lazy loading and script nonce attributes. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There is no published security policy or incident response contact information, which are important for transparency and trust. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics is standard but requires monitoring for privacy compliance. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers, policies, and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with GDPR compliance details.
  2. Implement and configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Add a security.txt file and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  4. Provide clear business contact information including email and phone to enhance trust and compliance.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for security and privacy compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Non Gamstop Casinos - OXON AA
Description
Non Gamstop casinos for UK players who want fast payouts, and fair play without the limits or noise. Real sites, real cash, no hand-holding.
Key services
Casino reviews, Affiliate links to casinos, Guides and informational articles about non Gamstop casinos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, WP Rocket, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Heroic Table of Contents plugin, jQuery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce attributes in scripts
  • Lazy loading of scripts and images

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, Google Site Kit
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based affiliate site focused on non Gamstop casinos for UK players.
  2. Content is well-structured with SEO optimization via Yoast.
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  4. No direct contact information or security policies published.
  5. Uses Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
  7. Domain is very new with some inconsistencies in registration date.
  8. No explicit adult content but gambling content targeted at adults.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3, using popular plugins like Yoast SEO for search engine optimization and WP Rocket for performance enhancements including lazy loading and script deferring. The tech stack includes jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy.com, LLC, as indicated by the WHOIS data. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and fast loading times. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is well implemented with meta tags, Open Graph, Twitter cards, and structured data (JSON-LD) for articles, organization, and FAQs. The domain is very new, which may indicate a startup or recently launched site. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and security configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ember.london. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ember.london.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.