Skip to main content

Security report for elpetit.cat

elPetit - festival internacional d'arts per a la primera infància · Other · Spain

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

elPetit is an international arts festival focused on early childhood, operating primarily in Catalonia, Spain. The festival emphasizes live artistic experiences for young children and runs events across multiple cities. The website reflects a niche cultural organization with a clear target audience of families and early childhood educators. The digital infrastructure is built on modern web technologies including jQuery, Foundation, and Matomo analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no obvious vulnerabilities, though security headers could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data is a notable anomaly but does not detract significantly from the overall trustworthiness given the professional web presence and active social media channels. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing explicit security policies, and improving direct contact information visibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Facebook, Twitter, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elpetit.cat

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The festival operates as a small cultural entity with a focused business model centered on event organization and promotion. It leverages partnerships with platforms like Eventis and Koobin for event management and ticketing. The business targets a specialized market segment, which may limit scale but enhances community engagement. The website content and social media presence support brand consistency and audience engagement. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, sponsorships, and training events. The lack of detailed company registration or VAT information suggests a small or non-commercial entity or a non-disclosed legal structure. Growth potential exists through expanded digital marketing and enhanced online services.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS and cookie consent mechanisms aligned with GDPR. Use of Matomo analytics with consent checks shows privacy awareness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security is a gap. No incident response or security policy information is published, which could hinder trust and preparedness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The missing WHOIS data raises a minor concern but is mitigated by the professional site and social presence. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be strengthened with additional controls and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Add a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve transparency.
  4. Enhance contact information visibility by including verified company emails and phone numbers.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
elPetit - festival internacional d'arts per a la primera infància
Description
Un Festival que reivindica la importància de viure experiències artístiques en viu en els primers anys de vida. Un Festival transversal que arriba el novembre a 11 ciutats del territori per a alimentar la curiositat, l’esperit crític, la creativitat, la comunicació i el joc del públic més petit…i no tan petit!
Key services
International arts festival for early childhood, Conferences and training, Event programming in multiple cities, Online ticket sales
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Foundation framework, Slick carousel, LightGallery, Google Fonts (Poppins), Mapbox GL JS, Matomo Analytics
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular options
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of analytics with consent checks

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and interactive features.
  2. No WAF or security challenge detected.
  3. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in WHOIS database, which is unusual.
  4. Site uses modern JavaScript libraries and frameworks.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policies are implemented and GDPR compliant.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found in HTML; contact via form only.
  7. Social media presence on Instagram, Twitter, Facebook is active.
  8. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  9. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a combination of jQuery, Foundation framework, Slick carousel, LightGallery, and Mapbox GL JS for interactive and visual features. Google Fonts are used for typography. The CMS appears to be Eventis, specialized for cultural event management. Performance is moderate with asynchronous script loading and lazy loading techniques. Accessibility features such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support are present. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The site is mobile responsive and includes cookie consent management. Technical risks include outdated jQuery version and missing security headers. Hosting provider details are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elpetit.cat. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elpetit.cat.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.