Skip to main content

Security report for elkosia.lv

elko.lv · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website elkosia.lv represents a Latvian company named elko.lv that offers project management, sales, and design services. The content is primarily in Latvian with some English language support. The site is built on WordPress and uses common web technologies including jQuery, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Google Maps API. The website is accessible without any WAF or security blocking mechanisms. However, the WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting the ability to verify domain registration details and ownership. The site includes a cookie consent banner indicating GDPR awareness but lacks visible contact information and detailed privacy or security policies. The technical implementation is moderate with room for improvement in security headers and accessibility. Tracking and marketing tools are extensively used, indicating a focus on user analytics and advertising. Overall, the website is functional but basic in content and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elkosia.lv

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Elko.lv appears to be a small service provider focused on project management and design within Latvia. The business model is service-oriented, targeting general audiences needing project and design services. The website lacks detailed business information such as company registration, contact details, or certifications, which limits trust signals. The use of multiple tracking and marketing tools suggests an interest in digital marketing and customer engagement. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the website content. The company’s market position and growth indicators are not explicitly stated, and the site content is minimal, indicating a potentially small or niche operation.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS with a presumably good SSL configuration, but no security headers were detected in the HTML source, which is a missed opportunity for enhancing security. There are no visible forms on the homepage, reducing immediate attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. The presence of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and requires regular updates to avoid vulnerabilities. No incident response or security policies are published, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are present. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, indicating some compliance with privacy regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved with better header implementation, visible security policies, and contact information for incident reporting.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish clear contact information including emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and facilitate communication.
  3. Add a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity and readiness to handle incidents.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
elko.lv
Description
The website appears to represent a company involved in project management, sales, and design services.
Key services
Projektu vadība un tirdzniecība, Projektēšana
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, Slick Carousel, Fancybox, Google Maps API
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses WordPress CMS with common plugins and libraries.
  4. Cookie consent banner is present and functional.
  5. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on the homepage.
  6. No terms of service or explicit privacy policy page found except cookie policy link.
  7. Tracking and analytics scripts are extensively used.
  8. No security headers detected in the HTML source.
  9. No visible forms on the homepage to collect user data.
  10. Content is minimal and mostly in Latvian language.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS and uses a variety of common JavaScript libraries and plugins such as jQuery, Slick Carousel, Fancybox, and Google Maps API. It integrates Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel for tracking and marketing purposes. The site loads external resources from reputable CDNs, which helps with performance. The design is basic and mobile optimization is present but minimal. SEO optimization is basic with canonical tags and meta tags present but limited. Accessibility features are minimal. The site performance is moderate, with no obvious blocking or errors. The lack of security headers and visible contact information are technical weaknesses. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elkosia.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elkosia.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.