Skip to main content

Security report for elisartworks.com

Ilze Elizabete Romančenko · Other · Latvia

Partial score · DNS & email only

68/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elisartworks.com is a small Latvian-based art business operated by Ilze Elizabete Romančenko, specializing in abstract paintings and painting workshops. The website offers direct sales of artworks and workshops through an e-commerce platform powered by WordPress and WooCommerce. The business targets art enthusiasts and potential buyers interested in unique abstract art and creative experiences. The site is professionally designed with consistent branding and clear navigation, supporting multiple languages including Latvian and English. Technically, the site leverages modern WordPress plugins and payment gateways, ensuring a functional and user-friendly experience with good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and some security plugins in use, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit incident response policies. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, enhancing user trust. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, warranting monitoring. Overall, the site presents a trustworthy and professional front for a niche art business with room for security enhancements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
70/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elisartworks.com

This scan found 10 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
70
Average
68

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention elisartworks.com, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for elisartworks.com right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche art sector, focusing on direct-to-consumer sales of original abstract paintings and painting workshops. Revenue streams include artwork sales, workshop fees, and gift cards. The company maintains active social media presence on Facebook and Instagram to engage its audience and promote offerings. The partnership with a local web development firm indicates a professional approach to digital presence. The business model is straightforward e-commerce with multilingual support, targeting primarily Latvian customers but also English speakers. Growth potential lies in expanding workshop offerings and online sales. The lack of detailed company registration data limits deeper corporate intelligence but the visible contact information and social media presence support legitimacy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS ensuring encrypted communication, which is a fundamental security requirement. Use of security plugins such as a honeypot for forms indicates awareness of spam and bot mitigation. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers like Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces defense-in-depth. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented, supporting GDPR compliance. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which is a gap in transparency. The missing WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, as it obscures domain ownership and registration details. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adding security headers, publishing security policies, and ensuring domain registration transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Regularly audit and update all WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and user trust.
  4. Investigate and resolve the missing WHOIS registration data to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce risk.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct periodic security assessments to maintain compliance and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ilze Elizabete Romančenko
Description
Website for an artist offering abstract paintings and painting workshops, including an online store and gift cards.
Key services
Abstract paintings, Painting workshops, Art sales, Gift cards
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, WooCommerce, jQuery, WPBakery Page Builder, MakeCommerce payment gateway, Omniva WooCommerce plugin, Instagram Feed plugin, TranslatePress multilingual, WhatsApp for WordPress
Frameworks
WooCommerce, WPBakery
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (honeypot)

Analytics and tracking

Services
WP Statistics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Custom Facebook Feed, WP Statistics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in registry, which is unusual for an active site.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern WordPress plugins.
  4. Contact info and social media links are present and consistent.
  5. Privacy and cookie policies are implemented.
  6. No explicit security headers detected; room for improvement.
  7. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
  8. Good user experience and design quality.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality, supported by plugins for payment processing (MakeCommerce), shipping (Omniva), multilingual support (TranslatePress), and social media integration (Instagram Feed, Custom Facebook Feed). The site uses jQuery and WPBakery Page Builder for UI components. Performance is moderate with deferred loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. The site uses HTTPS with valid SSL certificates. No hosting provider information was detected from the content. Accessibility is basic with some ARIA roles and language attributes set. SEO is supported by meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low but security headers are missing, representing an area for improvement. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and suitable for a small e-commerce art business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elisartworks.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elisartworks.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.