Skip to main content

Security report for elibroad.com

Eli Broad · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

64/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.elibroad.com presents a well-structured and visually appealing informational platform dedicated to the life and philanthropic legacy of Eli Broad. It leverages modern web technologies such as React and Gatsby, ensuring a responsive and moderately performant user experience. The content is focused on educational and cultural topics related to Eli Broad's contributions, targeting a general audience interested in biography and philanthropy. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about the domain's legitimacy and ownership transparency. The site lacks critical compliance documents such as privacy and cookie policies, and no contact information is provided, which impacts trust and business credibility. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing security headers and formal security policies. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences but requires improvements in compliance, security best practices, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness and professional standing.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elibroad.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
64

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website serves as an educational and informational resource about Eli Broad, focusing on his impact in business, education, science, art, and politics. It does not appear to operate a commercial business model but rather aims to inform and educate visitors. The target audience includes individuals interested in philanthropy, cultural history, and civic engagement. The site uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking but lacks advanced marketing or advertising integrations. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries linked directly from the site. The absence of registrant data and contact details limits the ability to fully assess business credibility and operational scale.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration, which is a fundamental security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no evidence of vulnerability disclosure policies, incident response contacts, or security certifications. The use of Google Analytics includes IP anonymization, indicating some privacy consideration. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as absence of contact information, suggests gaps in compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing standard security headers, formal policies, and transparent contact channels for security issues.

Recommendations

  1. Register the domain properly and ensure WHOIS data is available and accurate to improve legitimacy and trust.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Implement standard security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to strengthen security posture.
  4. Add clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  5. Consider adding a vulnerability disclosure policy and security.txt file to demonstrate security maturity and transparency.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eli Broad
Description
Eli Broad was a man who fell in love with solving problems. The website narrates the story of Eli Broad rooted in decades of cultural, economic, educational and civic change across the US, highlighting his entrepreneurial endeavors, investments in K-12 public education, scientific and medical research, art access, and civic engagement.
Key services
Information dissemination about Eli Broad's life and contributions, Educational content on business, education, science, art, politics related to Eli Broad
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React, Gatsby, Google Analytics
Frameworks
React, Gatsby
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms.
  2. No WHOIS registration data found, domain may be unregistered or very new.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the homepage.
  5. Site uses modern React and Gatsby frameworks with Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No security headers detected in the provided data.
  7. Content is focused on Eli Broad's biography and philanthropic work.
  8. No forms or data collection fields detected in the homepage HTML.
  9. No social media links explicitly found in the homepage HTML.
  10. Site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using React and Gatsby, indicating a modern and scalable front-end architecture. It uses Google Analytics for visitor tracking with IP anonymization enabled. The site is served over HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communications. The HTML and CSS appear valid and the site is mobile responsive with good SEO meta tags including Open Graph and Twitter cards. However, no CMS or hosting provider information is evident. Performance is moderate with preloading of scripts and images. Accessibility is basic but could be enhanced with ARIA roles and better semantic markup. The absence of security headers and compliance documents indicates technical debt in security and privacy implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elibroad.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elibroad.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.