Skip to main content

Security report for elfps.co.uk

East Lindsey Fire Protection Services Ltd · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

61/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

East Lindsey Fire Protection Services Ltd is a UK-based small business specializing in fire protection services including industrial fire and rescue cover, fire extinguisher maintenance, detection, and suppression systems. The company targets businesses and organizations requiring fire safety solutions, positioning itself as a local specialist. The website is professionally designed using the Wix platform, featuring structured data and social media integration, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries and is hosted on Wix, with good mobile optimization and basic SEO. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled and error monitoring via Sentry, but lacks important security headers and privacy compliance elements. The absence of WHOIS data due to domain naming rules violation reduces trustworthiness but the live, professional site suggests legitimate operations. Overall, the website is functional and credible but would benefit from enhanced privacy, security policies, and WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elfps.co.uk

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
59
Security headers
40
Email security
75
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
61

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the fire protection sector, providing essential safety services to industrial and commercial clients. Its business model is service-oriented, focusing on safety compliance and emergency preparedness. The presence of social media channels and structured data indicates an effort to engage customers and improve online visibility. However, the lack of detailed business registration information and privacy policies suggests room for improvement in transparency and compliance. The company appears to be a small, regionally focused player without evident subsidiaries or parent companies. Growth potential may be supported by digital marketing and enhanced trust signals.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a good SSL configuration and uses Sentry for error monitoring, which are positive security indicators. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection weakens its defense against common web attacks. No forms or input fields were detected, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user interaction. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response contact information is not provided, which could delay handling of security incidents. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements in headers, policies, and incident readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to enhance web security.
  3. Publish clear incident response and security contact information to improve readiness and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider registering the domain with compliant WHOIS information or using a domain that meets naming rules to improve legitimacy.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
East Lindsey Fire Protection Services Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
East Lindsey Fire Protection Services Ltd
Description
East Lindsey Fire Protection Services Ltd specialists from industrial fire and rescue cover to fire extinguisher, detection and fire suppresson systems.
Key services
Industrial fire and rescue cover, Fire extinguisher services, Fire detection systems, Fire suppression systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Wix.com Website Builder, JavaScript, Segmenter Polyfill, Sentry (error monitoring), Facebook SDK
Platforms
Wix
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of Sentry for error monitoring

Analytics and tracking

Services
Sentry (error monitoring)
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook SDK
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Wix platform with professional design.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is present but no email addresses found.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Twitter.
  5. No forms detected in the HTML content.
  6. No security headers detected in provided data.
  7. HTTPS is enabled with good SSL configuration.
  8. No evidence of malware or phishing.
  9. WHOIS data is missing due to domain naming rules violation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Wix platform, leveraging its CMS and hosting infrastructure. It uses modern JavaScript libraries and polyfills to support browser compatibility. Performance is moderate with some optimizations possible. Mobile responsiveness is good, and accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is basic with meta tags and structured data but could be enhanced. The technical stack is stable but limited by Wix platform constraints. There is no evidence of custom backend or advanced frameworks. The site would benefit from improved security headers and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elfps.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elfps.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.