Skip to main content

Security report for elektropunkts.lv

T-METĀLS, SIA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Elektropunkts.lv is a Latvian service provider specializing in the utilization and recycling of electrical and computer equipment. The company offers services to both businesses and private individuals, including the destruction of data carriers and issuance of utilization acts. The website reflects a small local business with a clear focus on environmental responsibility and compliance with local regulations. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern plugins for SEO and contact forms, and it employs HTTPS for secure communications. However, the absence of a privacy policy and terms of service pages indicates gaps in compliance and transparency. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS and cookie consent implemented, but lacks advanced security headers and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy for its business scope but would benefit from enhanced privacy and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elektropunkts.lv

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the niche market of electronic waste management and data destruction in Riga, Latvia. Its business model is service-oriented, targeting both corporate clients and private persons. The presence of a physical drop-off location and clear contact details supports customer trust and operational transparency. The website's content and structure suggest a focus on local market penetration rather than broad international reach. Marketing and analytics tools like Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel indicate an interest in tracking user engagement and improving service delivery. The company appears to maintain a straightforward operational model without complex partnerships or subsidiaries.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and cookie consent is implemented, which aligns with GDPR requirements. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of a security.txt file or incident response contact details limit the site's security robustness. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site does not provide explicit information about security policies or certifications, which could be improved to enhance user trust and compliance. Incident response readiness and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not evident, representing potential areas for risk mitigation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure and improve security transparency.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users, including those with disabilities.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and WordPress core to mitigate risks from outdated software.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Uzņēmums "T-METĀLS", SIA
VAT number
LV40003690533
Registration number
40003690533
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
T-METĀLS, SIA
Description
Elektropunkts.lv provides services related to the utilization of electrical and computer equipment, including utilization for companies and private persons, data carrier destruction, and issuance of utilization acts.
Key services
Electrical and computer equipment utilization, Utilization acts issuance, Data carrier destruction, Utilization service for companies and private persons, Drop-off location services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.2, Yoast SEO plugin, Contact Form 7, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, CookieYes cookie consent
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  3. Website uses HTTPS and modern WordPress CMS with SEO and contact form plugins.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, and physical address.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented via CookieYes.
  6. No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  7. No explicit security policies or incident response information published.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found.
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook.
  10. Website content is professional and relevant to electronic waste utilization services.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.2, utilizing popular plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a modern and maintainable CMS infrastructure. Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel are integrated for analytics and marketing purposes. The site loads external scripts asynchronously, which helps performance. Mobile optimization is good, and SEO meta tags are properly configured, including Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data for enhanced search engine visibility. However, no advanced frameworks or hosting provider details were identified. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in accessibility and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elektropunkts.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elektropunkts.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.