Skip to main content

Security report for elegal.cz

eLegal.cz · Other · Czech Republic

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

79/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eLegal.cz is a Czech-based legal services firm established in 2005, specializing in bridging law with business realities, particularly in corporate law, IT, GDPR compliance, eCommerce, intellectual property, real estate, and labor law. The firm targets businesses and startups requiring clear, practical legal advice with a modern understanding of technology and marketing. Their market position is supported by over 1,000 satisfied clients and a strong portfolio of testimonials and partner relationships. Technically, the website employs modern web technologies including jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, and Cookiebot for GDPR-compliant cookie consent. The site is mobile-optimized, well-structured, and performs moderately well. However, no explicit CMS or hosting provider information is available. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration and implements cookie consent and spam protection on forms. However, it lacks visible security headers and publicly disclosed security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and compliant with GDPR, with clear contact information and strong business credibility. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response policies, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to further improve security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
55/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching elegal.cz

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
60
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
55
Average
79

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

eLegal.cz operates as a specialized legal services provider focusing on business clients in sectors such as technology, eCommerce, and marketing. Their competitive advantage lies in combining legal expertise with business and technology understanding, offering clear and practical legal solutions. Revenue streams likely come from consulting, contract drafting, and compliance services. The firm maintains a strong partnership ecosystem with notable clients and partners, enhancing its market credibility. Growth indicators include extensive client testimonials and a broad service portfolio. The company maintains a small size but with a mature market presence since 2005.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and GDPR-compliant cookie consent mechanisms. The contact form includes spam protection via a honeypot field. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, and lack of publicly available security or incident response policies, indicate room for improvement. No immediate vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposures were found. The firm does not publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy, which could enhance transparency and incident handling readiness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for the business type but could be strengthened.

Recommendations

  1. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response plan on the website to improve transparency and preparedness.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate responsible vulnerability disclosure.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
eLegal advokátní kancelář, s.r.o.
Registration number
C 228208
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eLegal.cz
Description
We build bridges between law and your business reality. Highly experienced lawyers that also understand not only law but also the world of business, IT, technology, and marketing.
Key services
Corporate law and M&A, IT and technology law, eCommerce law, GDPR compliance and data protection, Intellectual property law, Real estate law, Labor law
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Contact form with spam protection (honeypot field)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Clear and comprehensive contact information including email, phone, physical addresses, and contact form.
  3. Strong focus on GDPR compliance and data protection services.
  4. Multiple client testimonials and partner logos enhance trust.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No signs of security blocking or WAF challenges.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies publicly disclosed.
  8. No terms of service page found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and common technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Owl Carousel, and Google services for analytics and tag management. Cookiebot is used for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management. The site is mobile-optimized and well-structured with good SEO meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts. No CMS is explicitly detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary solution. Hosting details are not disclosed. The site uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from enhanced security headers and accessibility improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with elegal.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review elegal.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.