Skip to main content

Security report for ekrans.lv

Ekrāns.lv · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Ekrāns.lv is a Latvian company specializing in the rental and installation of LED screens and audiovisual equipment for concerts, TV shows, corporate events, conferences, and sports games. The company positions itself as a leading provider in Latvia with a large inventory of high-resolution LED screens suitable for both indoor and outdoor use, serving clients domestically and across Europe. The website is built on WordPress and incorporates modern web technologies including jQuery and Slick Carousel for interactive content, alongside Google Analytics and Tag Manager for visitor tracking. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacking advanced security headers and privacy policies. Contact information is clearly presented, enhancing business credibility. However, the absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the site is professional and content-rich, targeting event organizers and corporate clients.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ekrans.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
20
Email security
85
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the event technology sector, focusing on equipment rental and installation services. Its market positioning as a leading LED screen rental provider in Latvia with European reach suggests a niche but competitive market presence. The business model relies on equipment rental for various event types, including corporate and entertainment sectors. The website's clear presentation of services, gallery of past events, and social media presence indicate active marketing efforts. The company appears small-sized with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The lack of privacy and cookie policies may pose compliance risks, and the absence of WHOIS data transparency could affect trust with new clients. Strategic partnerships are not explicitly identified beyond the web development partner. The company could benefit from enhanced compliance and security disclosures to strengthen market confidence.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, which is a fundamental security measure. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, or X-Content-Type-Options were detected, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no evidence of exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries in the HTML content. The absence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism indicates potential GDPR compliance gaps. No incident response or security contact information is provided, limiting the ability to report vulnerabilities. The use of common third-party scripts like Google Analytics introduces moderate user tracking. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by implementing recommended headers, privacy disclosures, and vulnerability reporting mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a security.txt file or dedicated vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Improve accessibility features to comply with standards and enhance user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ekrāns.lv
Description
Mēs nodarbojamies ar LED ekrānu nomu un uzstādīšanu koncertiem, TV šoviem, korporatīvajiem pasākumiem, konferencēm un sporta spēlēm. Mūsu uzņēmums sniedz pakalpojumus gan Latvijā, gan citās Eiropas valstīs. Piedāvājam Latvijā lielāko augstas izšķirtspējas LED ekrānu skaitu, paredzētus gan iekštelpām, gan ārtelpām.
Key services
LED screen rental, LED screen installation, Sound equipment rental, Video equipment rental
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.5.11, jQuery, Slick Carousel, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and content-rich for its business domain.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  5. Uses standard WordPress CMS with common plugins and Google Analytics for tracking.
  6. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is safe for general audiences.
  7. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  8. No security headers detected; opportunity for security improvements.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.5.11, utilizing jQuery and Slick Carousel for interactive sliders and content presentation. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated for visitor tracking and marketing analytics. The site uses external CDN resources for stylesheets and scripts, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good with responsive design and adaptive elements. SEO is supported by Rank Math plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format, enhancing search engine visibility. However, the site lacks advanced security headers and privacy compliance features. Hosting provider details are not explicitly identified. Overall, the technical infrastructure is standard for a small business website but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ekrans.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ekrans.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.