Skip to main content

Security report for eiger-int.com

Eiger International Ltd · Other · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

55/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eiger International Ltd is a small UK-based company specializing in marketing, design, and exhibition services with over 30 years of experience. Their website presents a professional image with clear descriptions of their services and client portfolio. Technically, the site is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and includes standard web technologies such as jQuery and Google Fonts. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and contact options. Security-wise, the site uses HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are areas for improvement. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the website is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security practices and compliance documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eiger-int.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
65
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
55

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets a diverse client base across the UK and Europe, ranging from sole traders to multinational corporations, focusing on creative marketing and exhibition solutions. Their business model is service-oriented, emphasizing long-term client relationships and tailored creative solutions. The website showcases a portfolio of past work and highlights the managing director's direct contact details, indicating a personalized approach. There is no evidence of partnerships or subsidiaries from the website content. The lack of social media presence and limited external domain links suggest a focused but modest digital footprint.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options, which are critical for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. The contact form uses POST method but no explicit anti-spam or input validation mechanisms are visible. No security policies, incident response contacts, or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present, indicating a low maturity in security governance. The missing WHOIS data further reduces trust and suggests the need for domain registration verification. Overall, the security posture is basic and requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Verify and update domain registration details to ensure WHOIS data is accurate and publicly available.
  4. Add a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eiger International Ltd
Description
Eiger International Ltd is a North Yorkshire based company offering over 30 years of expertise in design, marketing, graphic design, print, advertising, product development, event management, exhibition design and installation. They serve a broad client base from sole traders to blue chip multinationals across the UK and Europe. They emphasize long-term client relationships and tailored creative solutions at realistic costs.
Key services
Marketing, Graphic Design, Print, Advertising, Product Development, Event Management, Exhibition Design, Exhibition Installation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, jQuery, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Divi
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Contact form uses POST method

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible with full content and no blocking detected
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on site
  3. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and contact form
  4. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and standard plugins
  5. No social media links or external business partner domains found
  6. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information present
  7. WHOIS data is missing or domain not registered according to raw WHOIS output
  8. Website content is business-focused and safe for general audiences
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, leveraging jQuery and Google Fonts for frontend functionality and styling. The site loads with moderate performance and is mobile responsive. SEO optimization is basic with standard meta tags but lacks advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal but present. No advanced analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The hosting provider is not identifiable from the provided data. The site would benefit from performance optimization and enhanced SEO and accessibility practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eiger-int.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eiger-int.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.