Skip to main content

Security report for eifu.online

Other · Finland

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website eifu.online operates as a specialized platform providing users the ability to download manufacturer information by entering a Key-Code. The service targets manufacturers and customers who require access to detailed manufacturer data. The business model is focused on information delivery, with a simple user interface and limited content beyond the core search functionality. The domain is registered since 2016, indicating a stable presence, and the site is hosted by CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH. Technically, the site uses an ASP.NET Web Forms framework with legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.10.2 and featherlight.js for UI components. While HTTPS is enabled and a Thawte SSL certificate is present, the site lacks modern security headers and uses outdated libraries, which could pose security risks. Privacy compliance is minimal, with a privacy policy page available but no cookie consent mechanism or GDPR compliance indicators. Contact information is limited to a single support email address, with no phone or physical address provided. Overall, the site is functional but basic in design and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eifu.online

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
40
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention eifu.online, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for eifu.online right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform serves a niche market segment focused on manufacturer information retrieval, likely catering to industry professionals and manufacturers themselves. The business model appears to be service-oriented, possibly subscription or access-based, though no explicit monetization details are visible. The site’s market position is unclear due to limited content and lack of marketing or social media presence. Partnerships with Qarad and Analyz-it are indicated in the footer, suggesting collaboration or development support. The company operates from Finland, consistent with the selected country on the site. Growth indicators and revenue streams are not publicly disclosed. The platform’s simplicity and limited content suggest a small-scale operation.

Security posture

Security measures include HTTPS with a valid Thawte SSL certificate and domain status set to clientTransferProhibited, which protects against unauthorized domain transfers. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers (such as CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options), and the use of outdated JavaScript libraries reduce the overall security posture. No incident response or security policy information is provided, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site lacks cookie consent mechanisms, which is a compliance gap under GDPR. No signs of WAF or blocking mechanisms were detected, indicating open accessibility but also potential exposure to automated attacks. Recommendations include updating libraries, enabling DNSSEC, implementing security headers, and adding privacy compliance features.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to enhance domain security and prevent DNS spoofing.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, and X-Frame-Options.
  4. Add a cookie consent banner and mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  5. Develop and publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website provides a service to download manufacturer information by entering a Key-Code.
Key services
Manufacturer information download service
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, featherlight.js, jquery.placeholder, jquery.multiple.select, jquery.maskedinput, html5shiv, modernizr
Frameworks
ASP.NET Web Forms
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website provides a simple service for downloading manufacturer information via Key-Code.
  2. No privacy or cookie consent banners detected despite privacy policy presence.
  3. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries may pose security risks.
  4. No visible security headers or advanced security policies implemented.
  5. Website is accessible without WAF or blocking mechanisms.
  6. Contact information limited to a single support email; no phone or physical address found.
  7. No social media or marketing tracking detected.
  8. Basic design and navigation with limited content depth.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on ASP.NET Web Forms with a legacy front-end stack including jQuery 1.10.2 and featherlight.js. The HTML structure is valid but basic, with minimal SEO and accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with no advanced optimization detected. Mobile optimization is basic, with viewport meta tags present but no evidence of responsive design frameworks. Hosting is provided by CSL Computer Service Langenbach GmbH, a reputable registrar and hosting provider. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks, indicating potential technical debt and opportunities for modernization to improve security, performance, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eifu.online. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eifu.online.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.