Skip to main content

Security report for egordion.cz

nabídkaGORDION · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website egordion.tendersystems.cz is a government-related public procurement platform primarily serving Czech public sector entities such as the City of Prague. It provides listings of public tenders, filtering options, and supplier registration functionalities. The platform is built on legacy JavaServer Faces technology with RichFaces and Ajax4jsf components, indicating a mature but dated technical infrastructure. Google Analytics is used for visitor tracking, but no visible privacy or cookie policies are present, which is a compliance gap. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage implied but lacking explicit security headers and vulnerability disclosures. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trustworthiness, though the content and references to official government usage suggest legitimacy. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from modernization, improved privacy compliance, and enhanced security measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching egordion.cz

This scan found 30 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
32
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The platform targets government agencies and suppliers involved in public procurement in the Czech Republic. It operates as an essential electronic tool for managing tenders and supplier registrations, positioning itself as a niche government service. The business model revolves around providing transparent access to public contracts and facilitating supplier engagement. The partnership with tenderarena.cz indicates a strategic ecosystem for procurement solutions. The lack of explicit business contact information and WHOIS transparency limits external trust signals. Growth potential lies in modernization and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS usage but lacks critical security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and HSTS. No explicit incident response or security policy pages are found, and no vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are present. The use of legacy JSF and RichFaces components may expose the platform to known vulnerabilities if not regularly updated. Absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates GDPR compliance gaps. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires enhancements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with visible user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Establish a public security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly update all JavaScript libraries and server-side components to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve WHOIS data transparency or provide official domain registration information to strengthen legitimacy.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
nabídkaGORDION
Description
The website provides a platform for public procurement tenders, listing various public contracts and related information primarily for government entities such as the City of Prague. It serves as an electronic tool for managing and accessing public tenders and contracts.
Key services
Public tender listings, Supplier registration, Tender filtering and search, Tender archive access
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaServer Faces (JSF), RichFaces 3.3.0, Ajax4jsf, jQuery, Prototype.js, Google Analytics
Frameworks
RichFaces, JSF
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by https URL)
  • AJAX form submissions with view state tokens

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a government-related public procurement platform in Czech Republic.
  2. No WHOIS data available, limiting domain trust assessment.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  4. Uses legacy JSF and RichFaces technology stack.
  5. Includes Google Analytics for tracking without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  6. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the page.
  7. No social media links detected.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data.
  9. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure or security policy pages.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audience.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses JavaServer Faces with RichFaces 3.3.0 and Ajax4jsf, combined with jQuery and Prototype.js libraries. This indicates a mature but somewhat outdated technology stack. The site uses AJAX for dynamic content loading and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. Performance is moderate with no explicit mobile optimization detected. SEO and accessibility features are basic. The lack of modern frameworks or CMS suggests potential technical debt and modernization opportunities. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with egordion.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review egordion.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.