Skip to main content

Security report for egberlin.de

Other · Germany

Partial score · DNS & email only

56/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website egberlin.de is currently under construction, presenting only a placeholder page in German indicating that the site is being revised. The only contact information available is a single email address (info@egberlin.de). There is no additional business information, no privacy or cookie policies, and no visible security or compliance documentation. The domain uses Schlundtech nameservers, a German hosting provider, consistent with the website's language and domain. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with no detectable CMS, analytics, or advanced technologies. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS and security headers. Overall, the site lacks content, business credibility, and compliance features, resulting in a low trust and security score.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

2 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching egberlin.de

This scan found 16 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
Average
56

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the minimal content and lack of business details, it is not possible to determine the company's market position, business model, or key services. The website targets a general German-speaking audience but provides no clear value proposition or business insights. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated. The domain appears to be small scale and possibly newly registered or inactive during the redesign phase.

Security posture

The security posture is poor with no HTTPS detected and no security headers present. There are no visible forms or data collection points, reducing immediate risk but also indicating lack of security best practices. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR requirements. Overall, the site is low risk due to minimal functionality but also low security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Include terms of service and security policy pages to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Enhance website content with clear business information and contact details.
  5. Add security headers and consider implementing an incident response contact channel.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Website currently under revision with contact email provided.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently under construction with minimal content.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Only contact method is an email link.
  4. No scripts, analytics, or tracking technologies detected.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information available.
  6. WHOIS data shows domain is connected with Schlundtech nameservers.
  7. No social media or phone contact information present.
  8. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  9. No advertising or marketing tools detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is a simple static HTML page with inline CSS and no external scripts or frameworks detected. Hosting is via Schlundtech, a German provider. There is no CMS or analytics integration. The site is moderately performant due to minimal content but lacks SEO optimization and accessibility features. Mobile optimization is basic due to viewport meta tag but no advanced responsive design. The technical debt is low but modernization and content enrichment are needed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with egberlin.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review egberlin.de.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.