Skip to main content

Security report for egako.eu

Gransy s.r.o. · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website egako.eu represents the professional monthly publication 'Geodetický a Kartografický Obzor' (GaKO), a peer-reviewed journal focused on geodesy, cartography, and cadastral matters primarily serving professionals in the Czech Republic and Slovakia. The publication has a long historical legacy dating back to 1913 and is recognized in official research registries. The website provides access to current and archived issues, primarily in Czech, with an English alternate page available. The business model centers on specialized scientific publishing with electronic distribution since 2013. Technically, the site is built on WordPress 5.3.20, utilizing jQuery and several JavaScript plugins such as Nivo Slider. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization. SEO and accessibility features are present but could be improved. The site uses HTTPS, but no advanced security headers were detected, and some JavaScript libraries are outdated, posing potential security risks. From a security perspective, the site lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. Tracking is limited to Histats.com, indicating minimal user tracking. No adult or questionable content is present, and the site is accessible without WAF or security challenges. WHOIS data shows the domain is registered to Gransy s.r.o., a Czech company, consistent with the website's content and audience. Overall, the site is a credible and professional resource within its niche but would benefit from improved security practices, updated technical components, and enhanced privacy compliance to strengthen trust and regulatory adherence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching egako.eu

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
30
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GaKO holds a unique market position as the sole specialized publication jointly serving Czech and Slovak geodesy and cartography professionals. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing history, official recognition, and focused content. The business model is subscription and content distribution-based, targeting government agencies, researchers, educators, and commercial entities in the geospatial sector. Growth indicators include ongoing publication and digital transition since 2013. Partnerships with governmental bodies like ČÚZK and ÚGKK SR are evident through linked RSS feeds. The company operates as a small entity with a focused niche, maintaining consistent branding and professional content quality.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks several best practices such as security headers and updated libraries. The use of an outdated jQuery version introduces potential vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are absent, limiting transparency and readiness. Tracking is minimal, reducing privacy risks but also indicating limited user data governance. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but requires improvements to meet modern standards and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to the latest secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance and user consent mechanisms.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure contacts to improve transparency and security culture.
  5. Enhance mobile optimization and accessibility to improve user experience and compliance with accessibility standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Gransy s.r.o.
Description
Geodetický a kartografický obzor (GaKO) is a monthly peer-reviewed periodical recognized in the research information registry (RIV). It serves professionals in geodesy, cartography, and real estate cadastre in government, research, education, and commercial sectors. It is the only magazine with this focus published jointly in the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
Key services
Monthly publication of peer-reviewed articles, Providing scientific, educational, and professional content in geodesy and cartography, Archiving and digital access to past issues
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 5.3.20, jQuery 1.12.4, jQuery Migrate 1.4.1, Nivo Slider, Google Fonts (Roboto), Histats.com tracking
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs)
  • No visible exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Histats.com
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Histats.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional publication for geodesy and cartography.
  2. Content is in Czech with English alternate available.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the analyzed page.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  5. Uses WordPress CMS with some outdated JavaScript libraries.
  6. Includes tracking via Histats.com but no major ad networks or marketing tools detected.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No explicit security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  9. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 5.3.20 with a classic theme and uses jQuery 1.12.4 along with plugins like Nivo Slider. The site loads moderate performance resources including Google Fonts and external scripts. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta tags for SEO and alternate language versions. However, the JavaScript libraries are outdated, which may expose the site to security risks. The site lacks advanced security headers and modern frameworks. Mobile responsiveness is basic, and accessibility features are minimal but present. There is room for modernization to improve performance, security, and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 44/100High33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with egako.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review egako.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.