Skip to main content

Security report for efdpo.eu

European Federation of Data Protection Officers c/o BvD e. V. · Government · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The European Federation of Data Protection Officers (EFDPO) operates as a European network of national associations representing data protection and privacy officers. It serves as a partner to key European institutions such as the European Commission, European Parliament, and the European Data Protection Board, aiming to strengthen data protection as a competitive advantage for Europe. The organization is positioned as a non-profit federation focused on advocacy and representation within the European data protection landscape. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme, incorporating Matomo analytics for user tracking. The site demonstrates good SEO practices and a professional design, with mobile optimization and clear navigation. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enabled, though the absence of security headers suggests room for improvement. Privacy compliance is limited by the lack of explicit privacy and cookie policies in the analyzed content. Overall, the domain registration is privacy protected, which aligns with the organization's focus on data protection, and no suspicious indicators were found. The website is trustworthy and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
45/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: Telnet

      Port 23 (Telnet) is publicly accessible - Telnet - Unencrypted remote access

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to Telnet using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching efdpo.eu

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
45
Average
53
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

EFDPO occupies a niche position as a federation representing data protection officers across Europe, collaborating closely with EU institutions and national authorities. Its business model is centered on advocacy, networking, and representation rather than commercial activities. The target audience includes data protection officers, privacy professionals, and European regulatory bodies. The organization benefits from trust signals such as partnerships with major European institutions and a consistent brand presence. Revenue streams are likely derived from membership fees or grants typical of non-profit federations. The website's content quality and technical implementation support its mission, though the absence of detailed contact information and policies may limit user engagement. The federation's ecosystem appears focused on regulatory influence and professional collaboration within the data protection sector.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communications, which is mandatory for trustworthiness. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The use of Matomo analytics indicates a preference for privacy-conscious tracking. The absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies is a compliance gap, especially under GDPR requirements. Incident response and security policy information are not present, which could hinder transparency and readiness. Overall, the security maturity is moderate, with foundational protections in place but opportunities for enhancement in headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies clearly accessible on the website to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS to strengthen security posture.
  3. Publish incident response and security policy documentation to enhance transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility to facilitate communication and support trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
European Federation of Data Protection Officers c/o BvD e. V.
Description
EFDPO is a European network of national associations of data protection and privacy officers. Our mission to establish a European representation of interests for DPOs as a partner of institutions such as the European Commission, the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union, the European Data Protection Board and national data protection authorities.
Key services
Representation of DPO interests, Networking of national associations, Collaboration with EU institutions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Matomo Analytics, Yoast SEO, Divi Theme, WordPress
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable due to privacy protection by EURid.
  3. Website uses WordPress with Divi theme and Matomo analytics.
  4. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages detected in the provided content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Strong focus on data protection and privacy officer representation in Europe.
  7. Good SEO metadata and structured data present.
  8. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled.
  9. No forms detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  10. Social media presence confirmed via LinkedIn link.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, a popular and flexible design framework. It integrates Matomo analytics for user tracking, reflecting a privacy-aware approach. The site includes well-structured metadata and JSON-LD schema for SEO optimization. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but also no advanced optimization detected. Mobile responsiveness is good, ensuring accessibility across devices. Accessibility features are basic, suggesting room for improvement to meet higher standards. The absence of security headers and limited privacy documentation are technical gaps. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the organization's mission but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with efdpo.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review efdpo.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.