Skip to main content

Security report for efbet.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.efbet.net currently presents a location alert page with minimal content, indicating restricted access likely due to geolocation or security filtering. The WHOIS query for the domain returned no match, suggesting the domain may be unregistered, suspended, or privacy-protected with no public data available. No business or contact information, privacy policies, or terms of service are accessible, limiting the ability to assess the company's operations or legitimacy. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with no detectable scripts, analytics, or modern web technologies. Security posture is basic with HTTPS implied but no security headers or best practices observed. Overall, the site is inaccessible for comprehensive analysis and raises significant concerns about legitimacy and operational status.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching efbet.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
35
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention efbet.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
29,740
Employees
19
Customers
29,571
Third parties
150
Weak passwords
13%

Latest record dated 2026-06-06 · 29 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for efbet.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –mail.efbet.com2026-06-06
  • –mail.efbet.com2026-05-01
  • –mail.efbet.com2026-04-24
  • –webmail.efbet.com2025-09-01
  • –mail.efbet.com2025-08-26

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and WHOIS data, no meaningful business intelligence can be derived. The domain's unavailability and block page suggest the business is either not operational online or is restricted in certain regions. No information on market positioning, business model, or partnerships is available. The absence of contact details and policies further limits trust and credibility assessment.

Security posture

The security posture is weak given the absence of security headers, privacy policies, and incident response information. The site uses HTTPS but lacks other security best practices. The minimal content and block page suggest possible use of geolocation-based access control or WAF, but no specific WAF vendor is identified. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data are detected due to limited content. Compliance with GDPR or other regulations cannot be confirmed.

Recommendations

  1. Register and publish complete WHOIS data to improve domain legitimacy and trust
  2. Implement and publish privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to comply with regulations
  3. Provide clear business contact information including emails and phone numbers
  4. Enhance security posture by adding security headers and conducting vulnerability assessments
  5. Improve website accessibility and content quality to enable full business and security analysis
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. The website content is a location alert page with minimal content and no WHOIS data found. The raw WHOIS query returned 'No match for "WWW.EFBET.NET"', indicating the domain may not be registered or WHOIS data is protected. The page content is minimal and appears to be a block or restriction page, possibly due to geolocation or security filtering. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and appears to be a location alert or block page
  2. No WHOIS registration data available for the domain
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or business details present
  5. No scripts, analytics, or tracking technologies detected
  6. No external business or social media links found except for a single external image domain
  7. Website is not accessible for full content or business analysis
  8. Likely blocked by geolocation or security mechanisms
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves a static location alert page with no dynamic content or interactive elements. The HTML is minimal and lacks meta tags, structured data, or SEO optimization. No CMS or frameworks are detected. External resources are limited to images hosted on a third-party domain. Performance and mobile optimization cannot be fully assessed but appear poor due to minimal content and lack of responsive design. The site likely uses HTTPS but no advanced security configurations are evident.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with efbet.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review efbet.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.