Skip to main content

Security report for eezy.com

Eezy · Technology · N/a

Low risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eezy is a digital creative services company focused on simplifying creativity by providing digital downloads, resources, and services such as stock photos, vector art, videos, an online template editor, and custom graphic design through its Design Studio. The company targets creative professionals including designers, photographers, and videographers. The website positions Eezy as a trusted provider with partnerships with major global brands. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern JavaScript libraries and SEO optimizations, featuring Google Analytics and reCAPTCHA for analytics and security. Security posture is good with HTTPS and spam protection, but lacks some security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which raises some concerns about domain registration transparency but does not detract significantly from the business credibility given the professional site and external trust signals. Overall, Eezy presents a solid digital presence with room for improvement in privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eezy.com

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
55
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eezy operates in the technology and media sectors, providing a digital marketplace and design services platform. Its business model includes offering downloadable creative assets, an online editor for template customization, and access to professional design services. The company leverages partnerships with well-known brands to enhance market credibility. Revenue streams likely include asset sales, subscription or usage fees for the editor, and custom design service fees. The target customer segment is creative professionals and businesses needing design resources. The company maintains a strong social media presence and integrates marketing and analytics tools to support growth. The lack of direct contact emails or phone numbers on the main site suggests a focus on digital engagement channels. The relationship with vecteezy.com indicates a partner ecosystem that supports its offerings.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced site-wide, and Google reCAPTCHA is implemented on the contact form to mitigate spam and abuse. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Privacy compliance is partial, with privacy and terms policies hosted on a related domain but no visible cookie consent mechanism on the main site. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, indicating gaps in transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data is a concern for domain legitimacy but may be due to privacy protection. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended headers, cookie consent, and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen site security.
  2. Add a visible cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  3. Publish explicit security and incident response policies to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Clarify domain registration details or ensure WHOIS information is available to enhance legitimacy perception.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eezy
Description
We Simplify Creativity. Digital downloads, resources and services for your creative projects.
Key services
The Marketplace - stock photos, vector art, videos, The Template Editor - online design editor with templates, The Design Studio - custom graphic design services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Google Analytics, Google reCAPTCHA, GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform)
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on contact form
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge.
  2. Content is professionally presented and relevant to creative digital services.
  3. No direct company contact emails or phone numbers found; contact is via form and social media.
  4. Privacy and terms policies are hosted on a related domain (vecteezy.com).
  5. No explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  6. Security headers are not explicitly visible; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. Google reCAPTCHA is implemented on contact form for spam protection.
  8. WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust but website appears legitimate.
  9. Social media presence is strong with multiple platforms linked.
  10. No adult or questionable content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, GSAP for animations, and Yoast SEO for search optimization. It uses Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager for tracking and marketing purposes. The site loads external fonts from Google Fonts and scripts from reputable CDNs. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site structure is clear with well-implemented meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO. However, there is no explicit hosting provider information detected. The site could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and performance optimizations. The use of reCAPTCHA on forms is a positive security control. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports a professional and functional website but has room for modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eezy.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eezy.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.