Skip to main content

Security report for eeagrants.cz

Ministerstvo financí ČR · Government · Czech Republic

Low risk. No critical or high findings.

Security score

85/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website eeagrants.cz serves as the official portal for the EEA and Norway Grants managed by the Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic. It provides comprehensive information on funding programs, calls for proposals, bilateral cooperation, and news updates relevant to government entities, NGOs, researchers, and the general public interested in these grants. The site is positioned as a trusted government resource with a clear focus on transparency and accessibility. From a technical perspective, the website employs modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, with integration of Cookiebot for cookie consent management and analytics tools such as Google Analytics and Matomo. Hosting appears to be on Microsoft Azure, inferred from session cookies. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization, accessibility, and SEO practices, contributing to a positive user experience. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses a consent mechanism for cookies, reflecting compliance with privacy regulations. However, there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and implementing additional security headers. No vulnerabilities or suspicious activities were detected in the analyzed content. Overall, the website exhibits a strong security posture, good technical implementation, and high business credibility as a government entity. Strategic recommendations include enhancing transparency by publishing security and privacy policies, improving security headers, and providing clear contact information for incident response and data protection inquiries.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
88/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

No critical or high findings. These medium findings are worth fixing next.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Medium

      Privacy policy may not be GDPR compliant

      Privacy policy lacks explicit GDPR compliance elements

      What to do: Update privacy policy to explicitly address GDPR requirements and user rights

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Medium

      No DKIM record found

      DKIM adds cryptographic signatures to emails

      What to do: Configure DKIM with your email provider

    • Medium

      No MTA-STS Policy

      MTA-STS enforces TLS for email delivery

      What to do: Implement MTA-STS to prevent downgrade attacks

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Medium

      SSL Certificate Expires Within 90 Days

      SSL certificate expires in 57 days

      What to do: Plan SSL certificate renewal

    • Medium

      Mixed Content Detected

      4 resources loaded over insecure HTTP

      What to do: Ensure all resources (images, scripts, stylesheets) are loaded over HTTPS

Keep watching eeagrants.cz

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
90
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
88
Average
85

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic operates this site as a government platform to manage and disseminate information about the EEA and Norway Grants. The business model is centered on public funding management and grant facilitation. The target audience includes government bodies, NGOs, academia, and citizens interested in grant opportunities. The site benefits from its official status, consistent branding, and integration with partner domains such as mfcr.cz and kudyznudy.cz. The platform supports transparency and engagement through news updates and detailed program information, positioning it as a key resource in the Czech public funding ecosystem.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent via Cookiebot, and use of reputable analytics platforms. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers like Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options suggests areas for enhancement. The site currently lacks a vulnerability disclosure mechanism or security.txt file, which are recommended best practices for government websites. Overall, the security measures are adequate but could be strengthened to improve resilience and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Implement and advertise an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program and publish a security.txt file.
  5. Enhance contact information visibility including emails and phone numbers for support and data protection inquiries.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Ministerstvo financí České republiky
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Ministerstvo financí ČR
Description
Official website for the EEA and Norway Grants managed by the Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic, providing information on funding programs, calls, and cooperation.
Key services
Information dissemination about EEA and Norway Grants, Grant program details and application processes, News and updates related to funding, Bilateral cooperation information
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, Cookiebot, Google Analytics, Matomo Analytics
Platforms
Azure (inferred from cookies)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official government website for EEA and Norway Grants in Czech Republic.
  2. Uses Cookiebot for cookie consent management.
  3. Implements Google Analytics and Matomo for analytics.
  4. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage HTML.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages detected in provided content.
  6. Website is accessible without WAF or security challenge blocking.
  7. Good mobile and accessibility features observed.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript, integrating third-party services like Cookiebot, Google Analytics, and Matomo for analytics and consent management. Hosting is likely on Microsoft Azure, as indicated by session cookies related to ARR affinity. The site is well-structured with meta tags for SEO and Open Graph tags for social sharing. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility and mobile responsiveness are good, supporting a wide range of users. No CMS signatures were detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical risks are minimal but could be reduced by implementing additional security headers and improving policy disclosures.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eeagrants.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eeagrants.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.