Skip to main content

Security report for edo.lv

Edo Consult · Other · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

40/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Edo Consult is a Latvian consulting company specializing in business development, financial planning, project evaluation, and funding acquisition services targeted at entrepreneurs, municipalities, and NGOs. The website is built on an older TYPO3 CMS platform with Bootstrap for styling and integrates Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA for analytics and bot protection. The site content is professional and relevant to its target audience but lacks modern privacy and security features. The absence of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and ownership. Security posture is moderate with some best practices observed but missing critical security headers and updated CMS versions. Privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies and consent mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edo.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
40

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the consulting sector with a focus on financial and business development services in Latvia. Its business model revolves around providing advisory services to local businesses and public organizations. The website positions Edo Consult as a specialized local player but lacks visible trust signals such as certifications or social media presence. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates some level of digital marketing and analytics maturity. The absence of contact details and policies online may hinder customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website uses HTTPS and includes Google reCAPTCHA for bot mitigation, indicating basic security awareness. However, the use of an outdated TYPO3 CMS version (4.5) introduces potential vulnerabilities. No security headers were detected, and no vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided. The lack of privacy and cookie policies suggests non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limits, preventing full domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade TYPO3 CMS to a supported and secure version to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Obtain and display trust indicators such as certifications, verified contact information, and social media presence to enhance business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Edo Consult
Description
EDO Consult sniedz konsultācijas uzņēmējiem, pašvaldībām un NVO. Ienāciet mājaslapā un uzziniet vairāk par iespēju īstenot savu ideju!
Key services
finansējuma piesaistīšana, projektu novērtēšana, uzņēmuma attīstība
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
TYPO3 4.5 CMS, Bootstrap 3.0.3, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA for bot protection

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security mechanisms
  2. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content
  5. Website uses outdated TYPO3 CMS version (4.5) which may pose security risks
  6. Google Tag Manager and reCAPTCHA scripts are used
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data
  8. No social media links or business certifications found
  9. Content is in Latvian language targeting local businesses and NGOs
  10. Site design is professional but mobile optimization is basic
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on TYPO3 CMS version 4.5, which is outdated and may pose security risks. It uses Bootstrap 3.0.3 for responsive design and Google Tag Manager for analytics. Google reCAPTCHA is implemented for bot protection. The site has basic mobile optimization and accessibility features but lacks modern SEO and security enhancements. Performance is moderate, with no explicit hosting provider identified. The HTML is valid and well-structured but could benefit from modernization and improved technical SEO practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edo.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edo.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.