Skip to main content

Security report for edmeka.lv

SIA EDMEKA · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SIA EDMEKA is a small Latvian company specializing in sustainable and environmentally friendly forest management services. Their offerings include forest property management, purchasing various types of forest properties, cylinder servicing, and mechanical workshops. The company targets forest property owners and clients seeking sustainable forestry solutions within Latvia. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation and provides essential contact information, including phone, email, and physical address, supporting business credibility. Technically, the website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, leveraging jQuery and other JavaScript libraries, and is hosted via Amazon Cloudfront CDN. The site demonstrates moderate performance and good mobile optimization. However, accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal. The presence of a cookie consent banner and privacy policy page indicates basic privacy compliance. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes client-side form validation. However, no explicit HTTP security headers were detected, and there is no visible server-side form security or published security policies. The Facebook Pixel is used for tracking, indicating moderate user tracking. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain age and ownership verification. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved with additional headers, server-side protections, and published security policies. The overall risk assessment is moderate with no critical issues detected. Strategic recommendations include implementing security headers, enhancing form security, publishing security and incident response policies, and improving accessibility and SEO. These steps will enhance trust, compliance, and security posture for the company and its customers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edmeka.lv

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SIA EDMEKA operates in a niche market focused on sustainable forestry services in Latvia. Their competitive advantage lies in offering environmentally friendly forest management and a range of related services including property purchasing and mechanical servicing. The business model is service-oriented, targeting local forest owners and stakeholders. Revenue streams likely derive from service fees and property transactions. The company maintains an active social media presence on Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram, supporting marketing and customer engagement. Growth indicators are not explicit but the professional web presence and multi-channel contact options suggest a stable small business. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data. The company appears focused on local market penetration and maintaining trust through transparency and compliance.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website uses HTTPS and implements client-side validation for forms, which is positive. However, the absence of key HTTP security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No server-side anti-CSRF tokens or advanced form security mechanisms were observed. The use of Facebook Pixel introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance. No published security policies or incident response contacts were found, indicating gaps in security governance and transparency. The lack of WHOIS data limits domain trust verification. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small business but requires improvements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  2. Add server-side validation and anti-CSRF tokens to all forms to prevent injection and cross-site request forgery attacks.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and dependencies to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance website accessibility and SEO to improve user experience and search engine visibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
SIA EDMEKA
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SIA EDMEKA
Description
Uzņēmums nodarbojas ar ilgtspējīgu, videi draudzīgu meža apsaimniekošanu, piedāvājot pakalpojumus meža īpašumu apsaimniekošanā, meža īpašumu pirkšanā, cilindru servisu un mehāniskajām darbnīcām.
Key services
Meža apsaimniekošana, Meža īpašumu pirkšana, Cilindru serviss, Mehāniskās darbnīcas
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, Bannerplay, Mozello platform scripts
Platforms
Mozello CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by canonical link https://)
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • Form validation on client side

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is relevant and professionally presented for a small forestry services company.
  3. Privacy policy and cookie consent are implemented, indicating basic compliance.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit, limiting domain age and ownership verification.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook, TikTok, and Instagram supports legitimacy.
  6. No terms of service or explicit security policies found.
  7. Form collects personal data with client-side validation but lacks visible advanced security measures.
  8. No visible security headers detected in the provided data.
  9. Hosting uses Amazon Cloudfront CDN for content delivery.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Mozello CMS platform, utilizing jQuery 2.2.4, Fancybox 3, and Bannerplay JavaScript libraries. Hosting is provided via Amazon Cloudfront CDN, which supports content delivery performance. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes a cookie consent banner for privacy compliance. However, the technical implementation lacks modern security headers and advanced accessibility features. Performance is moderate, with potential for improvement through optimization and modernization of the tech stack. The absence of structured data such as JSON-LD limits SEO potential. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but could benefit from modernization and enhanced security controls.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edmeka.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edmeka.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.