Skip to main content

Security report for edge.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

59/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website edge.com currently serves as a parked domain page indicating the domain may be for sale. There is no active business content or services offered on the site. The domain is a premium, long-registered domain owned by Network Solutions, LLC, a reputable registrar. The site infrastructure relies on basic HTML and JavaScript with multiple third-party advertising and tracking scripts, including Google Adsense and AdsDeli. The site lacks privacy and cookie policies despite extensive tracking, and no contact or business information is provided. Security posture is minimal with no DNSSEC or security headers enabled, and the SSL configuration is basic. Overall, the site is accessible without WAF or blocking but provides limited value beyond domain parking and advertising.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching edge.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
59

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Edge.com is positioned as a premium domain currently parked for resale, with no active business operations or services. The business model is domain parking and monetization through advertising and affiliate links. The target audience is general internet users who may be interested in purchasing the domain. There are no clear revenue streams beyond advertising. The partnership ecosystem includes Network Solutions and web.com for domain and privacy policy hosting. The site shows no indicators of growth or active market presence.

Security posture

The security maturity level of the site is low. There are no security policies, incident response contacts, or certifications visible. The site lacks DNSSEC and security headers, which are basic best practices. Tracking scripts are present without user consent mechanisms, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No vulnerabilities such as exposed credentials or malware were detected, but the lack of security hardening and privacy compliance poses risks. Incident response readiness is not evident.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a clear and accessible privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and other privacy laws.
  2. Enable DNSSEC and configure essential security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to improve domain and site security.
  3. Provide transparent contact information and business details to improve trust and credibility.
  4. Review and limit third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve user trust.
  5. Develop a long-term strategy for the domain beyond parking to enhance business value and security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
The website is a parked domain page indicating the domain edge.com may be for sale. No active business content is present.
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, JavaScript, Google Adsense, Cloudfront CDN
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Adsense, AdsDeli
Tracking pixels
youseasky.com, rnatrk.com, googleadservices.com
Marketing tools
Google Adsense
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. The website is a parked domain page with no active business content.
  2. No privacy or cookie consent mechanisms are implemented despite tracking scripts.
  3. No contact information or business details are provided on the site.
  4. The site uses multiple third-party advertising and tracking scripts.
  5. No security headers or DNSSEC are enabled, indicating minimal security hardening.
  6. The domain is very old and registered with a reputable registrar, indicating legitimacy of ownership.
  7. The site is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic HTML and JavaScript with multiple third-party ad and tracking scripts, including Google Adsense and AdsDeli. Hosting is provided by Network Solutions, LLC, with Cloudfront CDN used for some assets. The site lacks modern CMS or frameworks and shows minimal mobile optimization and accessibility features. Performance is moderate but could be improved by reducing third-party scripts. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meaningful content and meta tags. Technical debt is high given the placeholder nature of the site.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with edge.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review edge.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.