The eCohesion-Portal Mecklenburg-Vorpommern is a government-operated web platform designed to facilitate electronic communication and data exchange between funding recipients and regional authorities or intermediaries. It primarily supports the management of approved funding projects within the region, co-financed by the European Union through the European Regional Development Fund. The portal itself does not process data but serves as a communication interface, targeting regional stakeholders involved in funding processes.
Technically, the website employs a modern front-end stack including Bootstrap 5.1.3, jQuery, and Popper.js, ensuring responsive design and usability. The site implements a Content-Security-Policy header with restrictive directives, although the use of 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' weakens its security posture. No analytics or tracking technologies are detected, aligning with privacy-conscious government standards. The site lacks a cookie consent mechanism, which is a minor compliance gap given GDPR requirements.
From a security perspective, the portal benefits from HTTPS and partial security header implementation but could improve by tightening CSP rules and adding additional headers such as HSTS and X-Frame-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were identified in the analyzed content. WHOIS data confirms domain legitimacy and consistency with the regional government entity.
Overall, the portal presents a trustworthy, professional, and functional government service with moderate technical sophistication and a good security baseline. Strategic improvements in security headers and privacy compliance would enhance its posture and user trust.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Content-Security-Policy header
Controls resources the browser is allowed to load
What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application
This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
60
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
63
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention ecohesionportal-mv.de, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for ecohesionportal-mv.de right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The portal serves a niche government function within Mecklenburg-Vorpommern, providing a digital communication channel for managing EU-funded regional development projects. Its market position is stable as a regional government service with no direct commercial competition. The business model is service-oriented, focusing on facilitating administrative processes rather than revenue generation. The target audience includes funding recipients, government agencies, and authorized intermediaries. The platform benefits from EU co-financing, which supports its operational sustainability. Partnerships appear limited to regional network providers and government entities. Growth potential is tied to regional funding programs and digital government initiatives.
Security posture
The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and a Content-Security-Policy header in place. However, the inclusion of 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' weakens the CSP effectiveness and could expose the site to cross-site scripting risks. The absence of additional security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection suggests room for improvement. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating a potential gap in security transparency. The lack of cookie consent mechanisms may also pose GDPR compliance risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a government informational portal but should be enhanced to meet higher assurance levels.
Recommendations
Remove 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval' from the Content-Security-Policy to strengthen protection against XSS attacks.
Implement additional security headers including Strict-Transport-Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR requirements and improve user privacy transparency.
Publish a security policy and vulnerability disclosure process to enhance trust and incident response readiness.
Regularly audit and update third-party libraries to mitigate risks from vulnerable components.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Land Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
Description
Das eCohesion-Portal bietet eine Kommunikationsplattform für den elektronischen Informationsaustausch zwischen Zuwendungsempfängern (Kunden) und Behörden bzw. zwischengeschalteten Stellen (Mandanten). Der Fokus liegt auf bewilligten Fördervorhaben und in Ausnahmefällen auf Vorhaben im Bewilligungsprozess. Das Portal selbst bietet keine Bearbeitungsfunktionen, die Datenverarbeitung erfolgt in den EDV-Systemen der Kunden und Mandanten.
Key services
Elektronischer Informationsaustausch, Kommunikationsplattform für Fördervorhaben
Content-Security-Policy header implemented with restrictive directives
No inline scripts allowed except one with sha256 hash
No child-src allowed
Script-src restricted to self with unsafe-eval and one hash
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is a government-funded portal for electronic communication related to regional funding projects.
Content is in German and targeted at regional stakeholders in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern.
No direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided on the main page.
Privacy and terms of service pages are available via modal dialogs.
No cookie consent mechanism detected despite EU funding and GDPR relevance.
Security headers are partially implemented but could be improved.
No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
No social media or external contact links found.
Site uses modern Bootstrap framework and jQuery libraries.
No forms present on the main page; login pages are linked but not analyzed here.
Technical notes
Notes
The website uses a standard modern front-end stack with Bootstrap 5.1.3 and jQuery libraries, ensuring responsive design and compatibility. The HTML structure is valid and includes meta viewport tags for mobile optimization. Performance is moderate, with no heavy external dependencies detected. Accessibility is basic, with some ARIA roles and semantic HTML present but no advanced accessibility features. SEO optimization is basic, with a descriptive title and meta charset but no Open Graph or structured data markup. Hosting details are not explicitly identified, but DNS name servers indicate regional network infrastructure. No CMS or backend technologies are discernible from the front-end content.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with ecohesionportal-mv.de. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ecohesionportal-mv.de.