Skip to main content

Security report for eco-lighthouse.org

Stiftelsen Miljøfyrtårn · Other · Norway

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

56/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Stiftelsen Miljøfyrtårn operates the Eco-Lighthouse certification scheme, a recognized environmental certification body in Norway established in 2010. The organization provides tools and consultancy services to help businesses make environmentally responsible and profitable decisions. Their market position is solid within the Norwegian environmental certification sector, targeting businesses seeking sustainability credentials. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content focused on environmental responsibility. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with modern libraries such as jQuery, UIkit, and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site is mobile-optimized and SEO-friendly, though accessibility features are basic. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced and domain transfer protection, but lacks DNSSEC and explicit security headers. Privacy compliance is partially met with a privacy and cookie policy present but no active consent mechanism. Contact information is clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. Overall, the site is trustworthy and well-maintained with minor areas for security and privacy improvement.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eco-lighthouse.org

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
56

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the environmental certification sector, providing a structured certification scheme to organizations in Norway. Their competitive advantage lies in their established reputation and government or industry recognition. Revenue streams likely include certification fees and consultancy services. The target customers are businesses and organizations aiming to improve their environmental impact. The partnership with Egde Consulting for website development indicates a professional approach to digital presence. Growth indicators include a decade-long domain age and active social media presence. The business ecosystem includes certification bodies, environmental agencies, and consulting partners.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and domain transfer lock in place. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options represents gaps that could be exploited. No incident response or security policy information is publicly available, which may impact transparency and readiness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. Compliance with GDPR is indicated but not fully demonstrated through consent mechanisms. Overall, the security posture is adequate but could be enhanced by implementing recommended best practices and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive security policy and incident response plan on the website.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and improve user privacy transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party libraries and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Stiftelsen Miljøfyrtårn
Description
The Eco-Lighthouse certification scheme is a concrete and effective tool that helps you make smart and profitable environmental choices.
Key services
Eco-Lighthouse certification, Industry criteria guidance, Environmental consultancy
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, UIkit, Slick Carousel, Google Tag Manager, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
WordPress, Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer prohibited domain status

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Content is relevant to environmental certification and consultancy.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including phone, email, and addresses.
  4. No evidence of security policy or incident response information on site.
  5. No terms of service page found.
  6. No cookie consent mechanism detected despite cookie policy presence.
  7. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices.
  8. No DNSSEC enabled which is a minor security gap.
  9. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn.
  10. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a combination of UIkit framework, jQuery, and Slick Carousel for UI components and interactivity. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and marketing tracking. The site loads fonts asynchronously from Adobe Typekit. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and the site is mobile responsive. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin with proper meta tags and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting details are not explicit but DNS points to hyp.net name servers. There is no evidence of advanced accessibility features beyond basic support. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 58/100Medium30 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eco-lighthouse.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eco-lighthouse.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.