Skip to main content

Security report for eclosia.com

Eclosia Group · Other · Mauritius

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Eclosia Group is a large diversified conglomerate based in Mauritius, operating across six main sectors including Food, Commerce, Logistics, Business Services, Education, and Hotels & Leisure. The company positions itself among the top five Mauritian groups with a regional presence spanning over 10 countries. Their business model focuses on production, commerce, and service sectors with multiple subsidiaries under their umbrella. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery, GSAP, and Swiper for interactive content, alongside Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and uses HTTPS, indicating a secure connection. However, some security best practices such as security headers and explicit incident response policies are not evident. From a security perspective, the site shows a moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and anonymized IP tracking in analytics. The absence of WHOIS registration data for the domain raises concerns about domain transparency and legitimacy, although the website content and business information appear credible. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the website is professional and trustworthy from a content and technical standpoint but would benefit from improved domain registration transparency and enhanced security headers. Strategic recommendations include adding explicit security policies, improving contact information visibility, and implementing vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 13 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eclosia.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Eclosia Group holds a strong market position as a top Mauritian conglomerate with diversified operations in food production, commerce, logistics, education, and hospitality. Their competitive advantage lies in their regional presence and broad sector coverage. The business model leverages multiple subsidiaries to cover production and service sectors, targeting regional markets in Africa and Indian Ocean islands. Growth indicators include a large employee base and active sustainability and career programs. Partnerships with marketing and development agencies are evident. The company appears to maintain a solid reputation and brand consistency, supporting ongoing expansion and stakeholder engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enforced and anonymized IP tracking in Google Analytics. However, the lack of visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of published security or incident response policies indicate gaps in security best practices. No vulnerability disclosures or security.txt files were found, limiting transparency for security researchers. The missing WHOIS domain registration data is a notable concern for domain legitimacy and trust. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a corporate site but requires enhancements to meet higher compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish explicit security and incident response policies on the website to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.
  5. Verify and update domain registration information to ensure transparency and trustworthiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Eclosia Group
Description
The Eclosia Group is regrouped into six sectors: Food, Commerce, Logistics, Business Services, Education, and Hotels & Leisure. It is a large Mauritian group with a regional presence in more than 10 countries.
Key services
Livestock feed production, Poultry production, Food commerce, Logistics services, Business services, Education, Hotels and leisure
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.4.1, GSAP 3.6.1, Swiper 6.7.0, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • IP anonymization in Google Analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
AddThis
Marketing tools
AddThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
  2. Content is professionally presented with clear business focus
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage
  4. Cookie consent banner present and functional
  5. No explicit security or incident response policies found
  6. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification
  7. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn
  8. Use of modern JavaScript libraries and analytics tools
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack with jQuery, GSAP, and Swiper for animations and interactive sliders. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Analytics is integrated for traffic analysis with IP anonymization enabled. The site is mobile responsive and includes SEO-friendly meta tags and Open Graph data. Performance is moderate with external CDN usage for libraries. No CMS or hosting provider details were detected. Technical debt appears low, but improvements in security headers and accessibility could enhance overall quality and reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eclosia.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eclosia.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.