Skip to main content

Security report for ebizforum.com

PROEBIZ s.r.o. · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

69/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

PROEBIZ s.r.o. operates the eBF festival, a leading event focused on the digitalization of corporate and public procurement. The company has established a strong market position in Central Europe by organizing annual conferences, workshops, and educational programs that attract procurement professionals and industry experts. Their business model centers on event management, education, and knowledge sharing in procurement digitization. The website reflects a mature digital presence with comprehensive content, program archives, and active social media engagement. Technically, the site uses modern frameworks like Bootstrap and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools, indicating a good level of digital maturity. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent implemented, though some security headers and explicit policies could be improved. Overall, the domain registration and company information are consistent and trustworthy, supporting the legitimacy of the business. The site is safe for general audiences and free from suspicious or adult content.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ebizforum.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
69

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets procurement specialists in both corporate and public sectors, leveraging partnerships with educational institutions and event venues. Their competitive advantage lies in their unique festival atmosphere combined with professional content and networking opportunities. Revenue streams likely include event ticket sales, sponsorships, and educational course fees. The presence of detailed testimonials and a long history since 2009 indicate strong customer engagement and brand loyalty. The partnership ecosystem includes related domains for program distribution and awards management, enhancing their market reach. Strategic observations suggest continued growth potential through expanding educational offerings and digital engagement.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. However, the absence of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and security headers like CSP or HSTS indicates room for improvement. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and requires ongoing monitoring. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The company should consider formalizing security policies and enhancing technical controls to strengthen their security posture and compliance readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance privacy compliance by detailing data retention policies and user rights related to tracking and analytics.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
PROEBIZ s.r.o.
VAT number
CZ64616398
Registration number
64616398
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
PROEBIZ s.r.o.
Description
eBF is a festival about the digitalization of purchasing and public procurement, featuring workshops, seminars, training, discussions, and a gala award ceremony focused on digitization in corporate and public procurement.
Key services
Annual procurement digitization festival, Workshops and seminars, Educational courses (DNT and DZT), Fair Sourcing Awards gala, Networking and exhibitions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, FontAwesome, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Snowplow Analytics, Leady tracking
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Snowplow Analytics, Leady tracking
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Snowplow Analytics, Leady tracking
Marketing tools
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Leady tracking
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional event and educational platform focused on procurement digitization.
  2. Content is rich with detailed program archives, speaker information, and testimonials.
  3. Strong presence of tracking and marketing scripts, but cookie consent is implemented.
  4. No visible security policy or incident response contacts found.
  5. WHOIS data is transparent and consistent with business identity.
  6. No suspicious or malicious indicators detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern tech stack featuring Bootstrap for responsive design and FontAwesome for icons. It uses jQuery and integrates multiple analytics and marketing tools such as Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Snowplow Analytics, and Leady tracking. The site is mobile optimized with good navigation and SEO practices. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in loading speed by optimizing third-party scripts. No CMS was detected, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Technical debt appears low, but adding security headers and improving accessibility features would enhance overall quality and reduce risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ebizforum.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ebizforum.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.