Skip to main content

Security report for eba.pl

eba sp. z o.o. · Manufacturing · Poland

High risk. 12 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

eba sp. z o.o. is a well-established Polish manufacturing company specializing in metal processing, contract production, and custom production since 1978. The company integrates metal with plastics, graphics, and electrics, serving industrial clients with expertise in metal, plate, wire, and profiles. Their website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, targeting manufacturing clients and industrial partners. The business model focuses on contract and custom manufacturing, positioning eba as an expert in the metal processing sector within Poland and potentially broader markets. The company maintains multiple office locations in Krosno, Gdynia, and Warsaw, enhancing its operational footprint. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and SEO practices, though accessibility features are basic. Performance is moderate, with room for improvement in loading speed and accessibility compliance. The technical infrastructure supports a professional online presence but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit cookie consent mechanisms. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and includes GDPR-compliant consent in its newsletter subscription form. However, it lacks visible security headers and published security or incident response policies. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the content. The WHOIS data aligns well with the business claims, showing a consistent and legitimate registration history. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adding explicit cookie policies, security headers, and incident response information. The overall risk assessment is low, with the website presenting a trustworthy and professional digital presence. Strategic recommendations include implementing a cookie policy and consent mechanism, publishing security policies, enhancing security headers, and improving accessibility. These steps will strengthen compliance, user trust, and security resilience.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

12 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: PostgreSQL

      Port 5432 (PostgreSQL) is publicly accessible - PostgreSQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to PostgreSQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection
  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching eba.pl

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

eba operates in the manufacturing sector with a focus on metal processing and contract production. The company leverages a B2B business model targeting industrial clients requiring custom metal solutions. Its long-standing market presence since 1978 indicates stability and expertise. The website's multi-language support suggests an intent to serve international clients. Partnerships with domains like evend.com.pl and ebahealthcare.com indicate a diversified ecosystem and potential cross-sector collaborations. Revenue streams likely include contract manufacturing services and custom production orders. The company’s digital presence is professional, supporting lead generation and client engagement through contact forms and newsletter subscriptions. Growth indicators include continuous factory enhancements and process optimization highlighted on the site. The partnership ecosystem and social media presence support brand visibility and market reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, ensuring encrypted communications. GDPR compliance is evident in the newsletter subscription consent. However, the absence of explicit cookie policies and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is published, which could delay response to security events. The use of reputable analytics and tracking tools is balanced with privacy considerations, but transparency could be improved. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were found. The security culture appears cautious but could benefit from formalized policies and enhanced technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to comply fully with privacy regulations.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common web attacks.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness for security incidents.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy and consider publishing a security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
eba sp. z o.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
eba sp. z o.o.
Description
eba - your manufacturing partner since 1978. metal processing. contract production, custom production. connecting metal with plastics, graphics, electrics. metal. plate. wire. profiles. experts in metal. POS
Key services
metal processing, contract production, custom production, metal-plastics-graphics-electrics integration
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, jQuery, Modernizr
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Consent checkbox for personal data processing in newsletter form

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Professional manufacturing company website with clear branding and business focus
  2. Multi-language support with English, Polish, German, French, Swedish
  3. Comprehensive contact information including multiple office locations
  4. Use of modern analytics and tracking tools
  5. Lack of explicit cookie policy and security policy pages
  6. No visible security headers in HTML content
  7. Good GDPR compliance in newsletter subscription form
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, utilizing modern SEO and analytics plugins such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Hotjar. The front-end uses jQuery and Modernizr for compatibility and feature detection. The site is multi-lingual with language selectors and hreflang tags, supporting international SEO. Performance is moderate with deferred JavaScript loading and optimized CSS. The site uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization. However, there is no evidence of advanced caching or CDN usage in the provided data. The absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates areas for technical improvement. Overall, the infrastructure supports a professional and functional website but could be modernized further to enhance security, performance, and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with eba.pl. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review eba.pl.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.