Skip to main content

Security report for easywl.com

EASYSPORT · Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.easywl.com hosts content related to the EWF CHISINAU 2025 weightlifting championship, providing event schedules, results, protocols, and live scoreboard embeds. The site targets weightlifting athletes, officials, and fans, serving as an informational portal for the event. The business model is focused on event information dissemination with no evident commercial transactions or user data collection. Technically, the site is basic, built with standard HTML and CSS, embedding YouTube videos for live content. There is no detected CMS or advanced frameworks, and the site lacks modern SEO and accessibility features. Security posture is minimal with no visible security headers or HTTPS confirmation in the data provided. The absence of privacy, cookie policies, and contact information indicates low compliance with data protection regulations. WHOIS data is missing, raising concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. Overall, the site functions as a niche event information platform but lacks professional security and compliance maturity.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching easywl.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates in the niche sports event sector, specifically weightlifting championships. It provides detailed competition data and live streaming links, positioning itself as an event results hub. The lack of business contact details and corporate information suggests a small-scale or event-specific operation rather than a commercial enterprise. The absence of privacy and security policies limits its appeal to professional partners or sponsors. The site does not appear to monetize directly or collect user data, focusing instead on content delivery. The partnership ecosystem is not evident, and no related domains or business affiliations are disclosed.

Security posture

Security maturity is low. The site does not present any security headers or documented SSL/TLS status. No forms or user input fields reduce attack surface but also limit engagement. The missing WHOIS data and lack of registrant information are significant trust concerns. There is no evidence of GDPR compliance or incident response mechanisms. The site does not use tracking or analytics scripts, which reduces privacy risks but also limits business intelligence. Overall, the security posture is minimal and requires improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data transmission and improve trust.
  2. Publish clear privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other data protection laws.
  3. Add contact information including business email and phone number to improve credibility and user trust.
  4. Configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Obtain and publish WHOIS registration details or ensure domain registration data is accurate and publicly available.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EASYSPORT
Description
The website provides information and results related to the EWF CHISINAU 2025 weightlifting championship event, including start and results books, live scoreboard, detailed results by weight categories for men and women, protocols, medals standings, medallists, Robi points, and scoreboards for each competition day.
Key services
Publishing start and results books, Live scoreboard streaming, Detailed competition results, Protocols and scoreboards, Medals and team classification, Medallists and best lifters points
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, YouTube embed iframe
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is focused on a specific sports event (weightlifting championship).
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details provided on the site.
  4. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual for an active .com domain.
  5. Site uses embedded YouTube videos for live scoreboard and scoreboards.
  6. No visible security headers or advanced technical features detected.
  7. Site design is basic with minimal styling and no advanced interactivity.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected.
  9. No forms or data collection mechanisms present.
  10. No social media links or company contact emails found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with basic HTML and CSS without any detected CMS or JavaScript frameworks. It relies on embedded YouTube iframes for live video content. The site lacks modern SEO meta tags beyond basic keywords and description. There are no analytics or tracking technologies detected, indicating minimal data collection. Performance is likely moderate given the simple structure but no explicit performance optimizations are evident. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with no ARIA roles or responsive meta tags detected. The site could benefit from modernization including responsive design, SEO enhancements, and security improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with easywl.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review easywl.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.