Skip to main content

Security report for easygreen.lv

EasyGreen · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

EasyGreen is a Latvian small business specializing in the sale and installation of natural turf lawns (paklājzāliens). The company targets homeowners, sports field managers, and construction companies seeking immediate green lawn solutions. The website is built on WordPress and uses modern SEO and analytics tools such as Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel. The site is well-designed, mobile-optimized, and provides rich multimedia content to engage visitors. However, the absence of explicit privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing security headers, indicates room for improvement in compliance and security posture. WHOIS data could not be retrieved due to query limits, limiting domain legitimacy verification. Overall, the site presents a professional and trustworthy front for a niche landscaping product provider in Latvia.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching easygreen.lv

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the landscaping and gardening sector, focusing on natural turf products and related services. Its business model appears to be direct sales combined with installation and maintenance services. The website content and structure suggest a well-established local presence with a focus on quality and customer satisfaction, as evidenced by customer reviews and detailed product information. The use of multiple languages (Latvian, English, Russian) indicates an intent to serve a broader regional audience. The company leverages digital marketing and analytics tools to optimize customer engagement and conversion. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of third-party analytics and tracking scripts introduces moderate user tracking, which should be balanced with privacy compliance measures. The absence of a security.txt file or incident response contact information limits the site's readiness for security incident handling. Overall, the security maturity is moderate but could be enhanced with standard best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy with explicit user consent mechanisms to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Create and host a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response communication.
  4. Provide clear and verified contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user trust.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential security risks and ensure optimal performance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
EasyGreen
Description
Paklājzāliens EasyGreen ir rūpīgi audzēta dabīga zāliena velēna, ko ieklāj jūsu dārzā, lai uzreiz iegūtu zaļu, sulīgu un vienmērīgu mauriņu. Piedāvā paklājzālienu un saistītos pakalpojumus, piemēram, ieklāšanu un zāliena kopšanu.
Key services
paklājzāliena pārdošana, zāliena ieklāšana, zāliena kopšana
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO plugin, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, YouTube embed
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager and analytics scripts asynchronously

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Hotjar, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Hotjar
Marketing tools
Hotjar
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia elements
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the HTML content
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided HTML snippet
  5. Use of modern tracking and analytics tools including Google Analytics, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel
  6. Website built on WordPress with Yoast SEO plugin for SEO optimization
  7. No security headers detected in the provided data; SSL is enabled
  8. No signs of adult or NSFW content
  9. Content is in Latvian with language alternates for English and Russian
  10. Business appears to be a small local company specializing in natural turf products
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS, leveraging Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. It uses asynchronous loading of analytics and tracking scripts including Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, and Facebook Pixel, which indicates a modern approach to user behavior analysis. The site is mobile-optimized and uses lazy loading for images to improve performance. However, no explicit hosting provider information was found. The site performance is moderate, with potential for improvement by optimizing third-party scripts and implementing caching strategies. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO is well addressed through meta tags and structured data (JSON-LD). The absence of security headers and privacy documentation are technical gaps that should be addressed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with easygreen.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review easygreen.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.