Skip to main content

Security report for e-ifu.com

Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.e-ifu.com serves as a digital portal for Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies, providing Instructions For Use (IFU) documents primarily targeted at healthcare professionals and patients. The site is part of the broader Johnson & Johnson MedTech ecosystem, a globally recognized leader in healthcare products. The business model focuses on delivering accessible, multilingual medical device documentation to support safe and effective device usage. Technically, the site is built on Drupal 10 with a modern technology stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 5, and various UI libraries, ensuring a responsive and accessible user experience. Integration with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Qualtrics indicates a mature approach to user analytics and feedback collection. The site demonstrates good mobile optimization and accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and secure Drupal forms but lacks visible security headers and published privacy or cookie policies, which are important for compliance and user trust. The absence of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain legitimacy, although the professional branding and content suggest affiliation with Johnson & Johnson. No vulnerabilities or adult content were detected, and no WAF or blocking mechanisms interfere with access. Overall, the site is professionally designed and functional but would benefit from improved transparency in domain registration, enhanced security headers, and clear privacy and cookie policies to strengthen compliance and trust.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of e-ifu.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e-ifu.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
75
Email security
30
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies operates in the healthcare sector, focusing on medical device documentation distribution. The company leverages its strong brand and global presence to provide digital IFU services, targeting healthcare professionals and patients worldwide. The multilingual support and integration with analytics tools indicate a customer-centric approach. The business model is service-oriented, enhancing product support and regulatory compliance. The lack of visible contact information and WHOIS data suggests a need for improved transparency. The site’s partnership ecosystem includes analytics and survey providers but no direct partner domains were identified. Growth indicators include the use of modern web technologies and ongoing user engagement via Qualtrics surveys.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, and Drupal’s form security features are utilized. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, limiting transparency and readiness. The missing WHOIS data is a significant red flag for domain legitimacy. Tracking scripts from Google and Qualtrics are present, but privacy compliance is minimal due to lack of visible policies. Overall, the site is functional but requires enhancements in security best practices and compliance documentation to reduce risk.

Recommendations

  1. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and configure essential security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance protection against web vulnerabilities.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Add incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to demonstrate security readiness.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to minimize privacy risks and maintain compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies
Description
The e-IFU website provides Instructions For Use (IFU) from Johnson & Johnson Medtech Companies.
Key services
Digital Instructions For Use (e-IFU) access, Product information and documentation, Multilingual support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap 5, Select2, Colorbox, Shepherd.js, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Qualtrics
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • Secure form with CSRF tokens (Drupal form_build_id present)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Qualtrics
Marketing tools
Qualtrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional portal for Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices e-IFU documents.
  2. No WHOIS registration data available, which is unusual for an active corporate site.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page.
  4. No direct contact emails or phone numbers visible on the landing page.
  5. Site uses modern web technologies and frameworks with good multilingual support.
  6. Tracking and analytics scripts from Google and Qualtrics are present.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; security posture could be improved.
  8. No signs of adult or questionable content; content is healthcare-focused and safe.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a robust Drupal 10 CMS platform, utilizing modern front-end libraries such as jQuery UI and Bootstrap 5 for responsive design and user interface components. The integration of Select2 and Colorbox enhances user interaction, while Shepherd.js supports guided tours. Analytics and user feedback are managed via Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Qualtrics, indicating a mature digital marketing and user engagement strategy. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. Accessibility features are well implemented, supporting a broad user base. The lack of visible security headers and incomplete WHOIS data represent technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall site security and trustworthiness.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 60/100Medium35 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e-ifu.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e-ifu.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.