Skip to main content

Security report for e-ifu.com

Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies · Healthcare · N/a

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Email security, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.e-ifu.com serves as a digital portal for accessing Instructions for Use (IFU) documents related to Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices. It targets medical professionals and patients, providing multilingual support and a structured interface for document retrieval. The site is branded consistently with Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies and uses modern web technologies including Drupal 10, Bootstrap 5, and various JavaScript libraries for enhanced user experience and functionality. Despite the professional presentation and clear business focus, the absence of WHOIS registration data raises questions about domain legitimacy, although the content and branding strongly suggest a legitimate enterprise presence. From a technical perspective, the site employs a robust technology stack with good mobile optimization and accessibility features. The use of Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Qualtrics indicates moderate user tracking and marketing analytics integration. However, the site lacks visible privacy and cookie policies, which impacts its privacy compliance rating. Security best practices such as HTTPS usage and secure form handling are observed, but security headers and incident response contact information are not evident. Overall, the security posture is moderate with no critical vulnerabilities detected in the provided content. The missing WHOIS data and lack of explicit privacy documentation are notable gaps. The website is safe for general audiences, with no adult or questionable content detected. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, enhancing security headers, and providing clear contact information for security incidents to improve trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching e-ifu.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
75
Email security
30
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a specialized service platform within the healthcare sector, specifically supporting Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices. Its market positioning is that of a subsidiary or service site providing essential documentation to healthcare professionals and patients. The business model focuses on digital distribution of regulatory and usage documents, which supports compliance and customer support functions. The target customer segments include medical professionals and patients requiring access to device instructions. The site leverages partnerships with analytics and survey providers such as Google and Qualtrics to gather user insights. Growth indicators are not directly visible, but the multilingual support and professional branding suggest a mature service offering. The absence of direct contact information and WHOIS data may indicate centralized management by the parent company or privacy considerations.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS usage and secure form tokens. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options reduces its defense-in-depth posture. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The lack of published security policies or incident response contacts limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is questionable due to missing privacy and cookie policies. Overall, the site is secure for general use but would benefit from enhanced security controls and compliance documentation to meet enterprise standards.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to strengthen security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and data protection officer to enhance incident response readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and libraries to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance transparency around data collection and retention policies to align with privacy best practices.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies
Description
The website provides Instructions for Use (IFU) documents from Johnson & Johnson MedTech companies.
Key services
Access to medical device Instructions for Use (IFU), Document search and download, Language selection for content
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap 5, Select2, DataTables, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Qualtrics
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure form with CSRF token (form_build_id present)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Qualtrics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Qualtrics
Marketing tools
Qualtrics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional healthcare document portal for Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices.
  2. Content is in multiple languages with a language selector.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on the landing page.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the landing page HTML.
  5. Uses modern web technologies and frameworks.
  6. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  7. WHOIS data is missing or domain not found in public WHOIS database.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10 CMS with extensive use of JavaScript libraries including jQuery, jQuery UI, Bootstrap 5, Select2, and DataTables, indicating a modern and interactive user interface. The integration of Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Qualtrics reflects a mature approach to user analytics and feedback collection. The site is mobile optimized and includes accessibility features, contributing to a positive user experience. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of slow loading but room for optimization. The absence of hosting provider information limits assessment of infrastructure robustness. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced SEO optimization and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 63/100Medium33 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with e-ifu.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review e-ifu.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.