Skip to main content

Security report for dwg.lv

DWG · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

DWG is a medium-sized independent structural engineering firm based in Latvia, specializing in efficient engineering solutions for architects, investors, manufacturers, contractors, and end-users. The company emphasizes cost-effective, safe, and design-faithful engineering services and has a track record of over 350 projects with a team of 30+ engineers. Their market position is regional with international experience across Northern Europe and neighboring countries. The website reflects a professional business model focused on consultancy and technical engineering services. Technically, the site uses modern front-end libraries such as Foundation, jQuery, and Snap.svg, with good mobile optimization and user experience. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information, and performance is moderate. Security posture is average with no visible security headers or HTTPS verification in the provided data, and no privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information is clearly provided, but no incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies are present. Overall, the site is safe, professional, and trustworthy but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dwg.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

DWG operates in the structural engineering sector with a focus on efficient engineering solutions. Their competitive advantage lies in their experienced team, extensive project portfolio, and use of advanced engineering software tools. The business model is consultancy-driven, targeting architects, investors, manufacturers, contractors, and end-users primarily in Northern Europe. Growth indicators include international project experience and a sizable engineering team. The company maintains a clear partnership ecosystem with no publicly listed subsidiaries or parent companies. Strategic observations suggest a stable regional player with potential for further digital maturity and compliance improvements.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is moderate. The website does not expose sensitive data and uses no vulnerable libraries in the front-end stack. However, the absence of security headers and privacy policies indicates gaps in security best practices and compliance. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms. GDPR compliance is not clearly demonstrated. The lack of HTTPS verification in the provided data is a concern and should be confirmed. Overall, the security culture appears basic and could be enhanced by implementing standard security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to ensure GDPR and other privacy regulation compliance.
  3. Deploy standard security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact information for security issues.
  5. Consider creating a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
DWG
Description
DWG is an independent firm of structural engineers, consultants and technical specialists that specialize in Efficient Engineering.
Key services
Structural Engineering, Consulting, Efficiency Audits, Element Drawings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Foundation Sites, Snap.svg, Magnific Popup, Owl Carousel, Video.js, YouTube iframe API, Typekit Fonts
Frameworks
Foundation
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No forms detected that collect sensitive data
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional structural engineering firm site with clear service descriptions.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Contact information is clearly provided including email, phone, and physical address in Latvia.
  4. No forms detected that collect user data, reducing privacy risk.
  5. Modern front-end libraries and frameworks used, but no CMS detected.
  6. No security headers or HTTPS status available from provided data; recommend verification.
  7. No advertising or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error; domain registration details unknown.
  9. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end technology stack including jQuery, Foundation framework, Snap.svg for vector graphics, Magnific Popup for modals, Owl Carousel for sliders, and Video.js for video playback. Fonts are loaded via Adobe Typekit. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design elements and good navigation clarity. No CMS or hosting provider information is detected, suggesting a custom or static site deployment. Performance is moderate, likely due to multiple external scripts and media content. Accessibility is basic, with no explicit ARIA roles or accessibility features detected. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by optimizing script loading and enhancing accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dwg.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dwg.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.