Skip to main content

Security report for dvigubasaciu.lt

UAB Dvigubas ačiū · E-commerce · Lithuania

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

38/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

UAB Dvigubas ačiū operates as a small Lithuanian company specializing in managing and developing classified ads and e-commerce portals primarily targeting smaller cities in Lithuania. Their business model revolves around providing localized advertising platforms and e-commerce services, supported by a network of city-specific classified ad websites. The company presents itself as energetic and innovative, focusing on user loyalty and continuous platform improvements. Technically, the website uses legacy jQuery and Google Analytics for tracking, with basic mobile optimization and moderate performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks modern security headers and uses outdated libraries, posing potential risks. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating compliance gaps. Contact information and company registration details are clearly provided, enhancing business credibility. WHOIS data is unavailable, limiting domain trust verification. Overall, the website is functional and professional but requires improvements in security and privacy compliance to enhance trust and reduce risk.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dvigubasaciu.lt

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
10
Average
38

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a niche market position focusing on smaller Lithuanian cities underserved by larger classified ad portals. Their competitive advantage lies in localized services and loyal user base. Revenue likely derives from advertising and service fees on their portals. The target customers include local residents and small businesses seeking affordable advertising and e-commerce solutions. The company maintains a network of related classified ad domains, indicating a strategic ecosystem approach. Growth indicators include multiple active portals and ongoing platform development. Partnerships appear limited to related local portals. The business operates with a small team and emphasizes customer gratitude and patriotism in branding.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. HTTPS is enforced, but the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces defense-in-depth. The use of an outdated jQuery version (1.10.2) introduces known vulnerabilities that could be exploited. No privacy or cookie policies are present, risking GDPR non-compliance. Incident response and security policy information are not disclosed, indicating limited transparency. No visible forms with advanced security controls were detected. Overall, the security posture requires enhancements to protect user data and maintain regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  2. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to comply with GDPR.
  3. Add essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen security posture.
  4. Establish and publish incident response and security policies to improve transparency and readiness.
  5. Conduct regular security audits and vulnerability assessments to proactively identify and remediate risks.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
UAB Dvigubas ačiū
Registration number
304405383
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
UAB Dvigubas ačiū
Description
UAB Dvigubas ačiū is a company managing and developing classified ads and e-commerce internet portals, focusing on local Lithuanian cities.
Key services
Management of classified ads portals, E-commerce platform development, Advertising services on portals
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.10.2, Google Analytics
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with company email, phone, and physical address.
  4. Use of outdated jQuery version poses potential security risk.
  5. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain trust verification.
  6. Multiple local classified ad portals linked, indicating a network of related business sites.
  7. Google Analytics used for user tracking without visible privacy disclosures.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; security posture can be improved.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5 and CSS, utilizing jQuery 1.10.2 and Google Analytics for user tracking. The site is mobile responsive with good navigation and content structure. However, the use of an outdated jQuery version is a technical debt and security risk. No modern JavaScript frameworks or CMS platforms were detected. Performance is moderate, with some room for optimization. SEO is basic with meta description present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. Accessibility features are minimal. Hosting provider and infrastructure details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is functional but could benefit from modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dvigubasaciu.lt. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dvigubasaciu.lt.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.