Skip to main content

Security report for duurzame-blogs.com

Other · N/a

High risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Duurzame Blogs is a recently launched website (created October 2023) focused on providing sustainable business blogs, news, insights, and inspiration about companies striving for a greener future. The site targets a general audience interested in sustainability topics and operates primarily as a content publishing platform. The website uses October CMS as its content management system and incorporates modern frontend technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Carousel, and PhotoSwipe, along with Google Fonts and Font Awesome for styling and icons. Hosting appears to be managed by TransIP, a reputable provider. From a technical perspective, the site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and canonical links. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching duurzame-blogs.com

This scan found 29 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
68
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a niche content provider in the sustainability sector, offering blogs and news to inspire businesses and individuals towards a sustainable future. The business model is content-driven, likely monetized through advertising or partnerships, though no explicit monetization details are found. The domain is newly registered, consistent with a startup or new initiative. No explicit business registration or legal entity information is provided on the site. The lack of contact details and privacy policies may limit trust and credibility with users. The site integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for user tracking and marketing insights, indicating some level of digital maturity. No partnerships or related domains are identified from the data.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. The domain status includes clientTransferProhibited, preventing unauthorized domain transfers. However, DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a missed opportunity to enhance DNS security. No security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options are detected in the provided data, which could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. There is no evidence of a published security policy, incident response plan, or vulnerability disclosure program. No contact channels for security incidents (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails) are found. The site uses common third-party libraries and frameworks, but no known vulnerable versions are identified. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be significantly improved by implementing security headers, DNSSEC, and transparency around security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS integrity and security.
  2. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Add clear contact information including company email and phone numbers to improve business credibility and user support.
  4. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to mitigate common web vulnerabilities.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file and provide incident response contact channels to demonstrate security maturity.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Duurzame Blogs is een website vol met duurzame blogs, nieuws, inzichten en inspiratie over bedrijven die streven naar een duurzamere toekomst
Key services
sustainable blogs, news, insights, inspiration about sustainable companies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap, jQuery, Slick Carousel, PhotoSwipe, Google Fonts, Font Awesome
Frameworks
October CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (via gtag.js)
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found
  4. Uses modern frontend technologies and October CMS
  5. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used for tracking
  6. Domain is newly registered with no suspicious WHOIS data
  7. No explicit security headers detected in provided data
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt found
  9. Content is focused on sustainability blogs and news
  10. No adult or questionable content detected
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on October CMS, a PHP-based CMS, and uses a modern frontend stack including Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for DOM manipulation, Slick Carousel for sliders, and PhotoSwipe for image galleries. Google Fonts and Font Awesome provide typography and iconography. The site loads external scripts asynchronously where possible, including Google Analytics and Tag Manager, which helps with performance. The site is hosted on TransIP, a known hosting provider. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in accessibility and SEO. The site uses canonical URLs and meta tags appropriately. No broken links or errors are detected in the provided content. The technical implementation is solid for a small content site but could benefit from enhanced accessibility features and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with duurzame-blogs.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review duurzame-blogs.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.