Skip to main content

Security report for dussmann.lv

Dussmann.lv · Other · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dussmann.lv is a Latvian language website focused on marketing strategy, business insights, and cultural content primarily targeting Latvian business owners and marketers. The site operates as a WordPress blog using popular plugins such as All in One SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The website is well-structured with good content quality and SEO optimization, but lacks advanced accessibility features and explicit contact information. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled, but the absence of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates room for improvement. The lack of WHOIS data limits the ability to fully verify domain legitimacy and business registration details, which impacts trust assessment. Overall, the site is functional and professional but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dussmann.lv

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions itself as a niche content provider in the Latvian marketing and business advice space, focusing on small to medium-sized enterprises or individual business owners. Its business model revolves around content publishing and possibly affiliate marketing or advertising, though no explicit ad networks or affiliate programs were detected. The site leverages common WordPress technologies and SEO tools to maintain visibility. There is no evidence of a larger corporate structure or subsidiaries. The absence of clear contact details and certifications suggests a small independent operation with limited formal business disclosures.

Security posture

Security maturity is moderate. The site uses HTTPS, which is mandatory, but lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The use of Contact Form 7 indicates potential data collection points, but no explicit security or privacy notices related to data protection were found. There is no incident response or vulnerability disclosure information available, which could hinder timely handling of security issues. The site should implement stronger security headers, cookie consent, and incident response contact details to improve its security posture and compliance with GDPR and other regulations.

Recommendations

  1. Implement essential security headers (Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner and detailed cookie policy to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish explicit contact information including emails and phone numbers for business and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact to improve security readiness.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to meet modern standards and improve user experience for all visitors.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dussmann.lv
Description
Konfliktu uzņēmumu īpašnieki var pārvarēt masas un piesaistīt klientus, kas ir piemēroti viņu produktam, izpildot zvaigžņu mārketinga stratēģiju
Key services
Marketing strategy guidance, Business insights, Cultural content
Content quality
good
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, jQuery, Elementor, All in One SEO, Contact Form 7, Getwid Blocks, Simple Floating Menu, Metronet Profile Picture
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
All in One SEO, Contact Form 7
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress blog focused on marketing and business topics in Latvian language
  2. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on the site
  4. Privacy policy page exists but cookie policy and consent mechanism are missing
  5. No security headers detected in HTML source
  6. HTTPS is enabled and site loads fully
  7. No forms with sensitive data fields detected except Contact Form 7 plugin usage
  8. No social media links explicitly found
  9. Site uses multiple WordPress plugins for SEO, UI, and content management
  10. No visible certifications or security policies
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.1 with a combination of plugins including Elementor for page building, All in One SEO for search engine optimization, Contact Form 7 for forms, and Getwid Blocks for content blocks. The site loads external resources from Google Fonts and uses jQuery libraries. Performance is moderate with no major issues detected, and the site is mobile optimized. However, the lack of security headers and cookie consent mechanisms indicates technical debt in security and privacy compliance. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. The site uses standard HTML5 and CSS with some inline styles and custom scripts for UI enhancements. Overall, the technical infrastructure is typical for a small content-focused WordPress site but requires improvements in security and privacy implementations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dussmann.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dussmann.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.