The website dumplinghouse.lv currently serves as a placeholder indicating that the domain is for sale and does not provide any business or product information. The only contact detail is an email address for domain purchase inquiries. The site is built on WordPress with several plugins including a GDPR cookie consent plugin and a statistics plugin. The technical infrastructure is basic but functional, with HTTPS enabled and some modern web fonts and scripts used. However, the site lacks critical business information, privacy policies, and security headers, which limits its credibility and compliance posture. No WHOIS data was available due to query limits, restricting trust analysis. Overall, the site is minimal and primarily serves as a domain sale landing page.
Scanned ·
NIS2 and GDPR posture
GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
GDPR outside view
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
Critical
EU business without adequate privacy measures
EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements
What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures
High
No Privacy Policy found
GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy
What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently
SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.
Critical
No email authentication configured
Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing
What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
45
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention dumplinghouse.lv, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for dumplinghouse.lv right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
The domain dumplinghouse.lv appears to be positioned for resale rather than active business operations. There is no evidence of active business services, products, or market positioning. The target audience is domain buyers. The business model is domain resale, with no visible revenue streams or partnerships. The lack of business content and contact information suggests the domain is either newly acquired or abandoned. There are no indicators of growth or strategic partnerships. The site does not provide VAT, registration, or legal company information.
Security posture
The website uses HTTPS, which is a positive security indicator. However, no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or X-Frame-Options were detected, which could improve protection against common web attacks. There are no visible forms or user inputs, reducing attack surface, but also limiting user engagement. The site uses a GDPR cookie consent plugin, indicating some awareness of privacy compliance, but no privacy policy or terms of service pages were found. The absence of WHOIS data limits domain trust assessment. Overall, the security posture is basic and could be improved with standard best practices.
Recommendations
Add a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
Implement security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security.
Publish terms of service and security policy pages to clarify user rights and security measures.
Obtain and publish WHOIS data or ensure domain registration details are accessible to improve legitimacy.
Enhance website content to provide clear business information and improve credibility.
Site observations
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Description
The website states that it does not provide information about dumplings and that the domain is for sale. It includes a contact email for domain purchase inquiries.
Key services
Domain sale
Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate
Technology
Stack
WordPress, Google Fonts, jQuery, Burst Statistics plugin, Complianz GDPR plugin, Otter Blocks plugin, Theme Twenty Twenty Five
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic
Security
Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
Analytics and tracking
Services
Burst Statistics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Transparency
poor
Site quality
Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low
Key observations
Website is a placeholder indicating domain is for sale.
No business or product information is provided.
No privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
Only one contact email found related to domain sale.
Uses WordPress with several plugins including GDPR cookie consent.
No security headers detected in HTML content.
No forms or user input fields present.
No social media or phone contact information found.
No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
No adult or explicit content detected.
Technical notes
Notes
The website is built on WordPress using the Twenty Twenty Five theme and several plugins including Burst Statistics for analytics and Complianz GDPR for cookie consent. It uses Google Fonts and jQuery. The site is mobile responsive with basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with no evident broken elements. However, the site lacks advanced SEO optimization and accessibility enhancements. The absence of security headers and minimal content indicate technical debt and opportunity for modernization. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the content.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with dumplinghouse.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dumplinghouse.lv.