Skip to main content

Security report for dsopribram.cz

Společenství obcí ORP Příbram · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Společenství obcí ORP Příbram is a voluntary association of municipalities in the Příbram region of the Czech Republic, established in 2015. It serves as a non-profit governmental entity providing joint services, educational programs, public procurement, and information resources to its member municipalities. The website is professionally designed, well-structured, and targets local government officials and residents within the region. The business model focuses on collaboration and shared municipal services, positioning it as a key regional governmental organization. Technically, the website employs a modern JavaScript stack including jQuery, Bootstrap, Swiper, and other libraries, hosted on a custom CMS platform likely provided by Galileo Corporation. The site is mobile-optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices and a cookie consent mechanism in place. However, no privacy policy or terms of service pages were found, which is a compliance gap. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS and implements cookie consent but lacks visible security headers and published security policies or incident response contacts. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The WHOIS data is missing, which reduces trust slightly but the official contact information and domain usage support legitimacy. Overall, the website is a credible and professional government association site with moderate technical maturity and some room for improvement in privacy and security documentation. Strategic recommendations include publishing privacy and security policies, implementing security headers, and improving WHOIS transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dsopribram.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
30
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
10
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization operates as a regional governmental association serving multiple municipalities in the Příbram area. Its competitive advantage lies in providing centralized services and resources that individual municipalities might not efficiently manage alone. Revenue streams likely come from member contributions and government funding. The target customers are municipal officials and local residents. The partnership ecosystem includes national government portals and regional service providers. Growth indicators include active project management and educational offerings. The website reflects a stable, small-sized entity focused on public service rather than commercial growth.

Security posture

The current security maturity is moderate. The site uses HTTPS and cookie consent, which are positive indicators. However, the absence of security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is published, which limits transparency and readiness. Compliance with GDPR is partial due to missing privacy policy documentation. No known vulnerabilities or exposed credentials were found. The security culture appears basic, with room to enhance policies and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen security posture.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible reporting.
  4. Regularly update all third-party libraries and scripts to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Improve WHOIS transparency or provide domain registration details to enhance legitimacy perception.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Společenství obcí ORP Příbram
Registration number
04513151
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Společenství obcí ORP Příbram
Description
Společenství obcí ORP Příbram is a voluntary association of municipalities in the Příbram region, established in 2015, providing joint services and cooperation among member municipalities.
Key services
Joint municipal services, Educational courses, Public procurement, Information dissemination, Project management
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, jQuery Mmenu 7.0.6, Highslide JS, Swiper 4.5.0, Popper.js
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS assumed (site uses https URL)
  • Cookie consent mechanism implemented

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in Czech language.
  2. No privacy policy page found, but cookie consent is implemented.
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with phone, email, physical addresses, and contact form.
  4. No security.txt or incident response info found.
  5. WHOIS data is missing or not publicly available, which is unusual but not uncommon for Czech domains.
  6. Website uses multiple external official government and partner links.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Technical stack is modern and includes popular JS libraries and frameworks.
  9. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in provided HTML.
  10. No visible security headers in HTML source; server headers unknown.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a custom CMS platform with a modern front-end stack including jQuery, Bootstrap 4.4.1, Swiper, and Highslide JS. It uses responsive design techniques for mobile optimization and includes accessibility features such as ARIA labels and keyboard navigation support. Performance is moderate with some room for optimization. The site lacks visible analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. Technical debt appears low, but modernization opportunities include upgrading to newer Bootstrap versions and implementing progressive web app features. Hosting provider details are not disclosed.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dsopribram.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dsopribram.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.