Skip to main content

Security report for dso-ostruzna.cz

Dobrovolný svazek obcí Ostružná · Government · Czech Republic

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

44/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dobrovolný svazek obcí Ostružná is a voluntary association of municipalities in the Czech Republic, serving as a cooperative body for local government entities including Velhartice, Kolinec, Mokrosuky, Chlistov, Hlavňovice, and Číhaň. The website provides basic information about the association, its member municipalities, and contact details. The site is modest in design and functionality, focusing on informational content rather than interactive features. Technically, the site uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and includes Google Analytics for visitor tracking, but lacks modern security features such as HTTPS enforcement and security headers. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. The WHOIS data for the domain is unavailable, which limits the ability to verify domain registration legitimacy and age. Overall, the site serves its purpose as a local government information portal but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dso-ostruzna.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
85
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
44

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The association operates in the government and non-profit sector, focusing on municipal cooperation and project implementation. Its market position is local and essential for the member municipalities. The business model is non-commercial, centered on public service and community development. The website links to official municipal domains, indicating a network of partnerships within the region. Revenue streams are likely public funding and grants, typical for such entities. The target audience includes local residents, municipal officials, and stakeholders interested in regional development. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not explicitly detailed on the site. The hosting and web design are provided by a regional service provider, ŠumavaNet.CZ, suggesting a localized IT infrastructure.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak. The absence of HTTPS and security headers exposes users to potential risks such as data interception and clickjacking. The site does not display any privacy or cookie policies, nor does it implement consent mechanisms for tracking, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited security governance. The use of Google Analytics without visible consent further complicates privacy compliance. No forms or input fields reduce the attack surface, but the overall lack of modern security practices is a concern. The missing WHOIS data also raises questions about domain transparency and trustworthiness.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate and enforce HSTS to secure user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Introduce a cookie consent mechanism to inform users about tracking and obtain consent.
  5. Modernize the website's technical stack and improve mobile responsiveness and accessibility.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dobrovolný svazek obcí Ostružná
Registration number
75134578
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dobrovolný svazek obcí Ostružná
Description
Dobrovolný svazek obcí Ostružná is a voluntary association of municipalities including Velhartice, Kolinec, Mokrosuky, Chlistov, Hlavňovice, and Číhaň. They collaborate on various projects and serve local government functions.
Key services
Municipal cooperation, Project implementation, Information dissemination
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery, Google Analytics, jQuery UI, Fancybox, Dynamic Drive Content Slider, Google Fonts (Roboto, Open Sans)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a local government association site with basic informational content.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. No HTTPS or security headers detected in provided data, indicating weak security posture.
  4. WHOIS data unavailable, limiting domain legitimacy verification.
  5. Use of Google Analytics indicates user tracking without visible consent mechanism.
  6. Site uses older technologies like jQuery and lacks modern responsive design features.
  7. Contact information is clearly presented with official emails and phone numbers.
  8. No forms detected on the page, limiting data collection risks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses older JavaScript libraries including jQuery and jQuery UI, along with Fancybox for image display and a Dynamic Drive content slider. Google Fonts are used for typography, and Google Analytics is integrated for visitor tracking. The site is hosted and designed by ŠumavaNet.CZ, a regional provider. The HTML structure is basic with multiple CSS files for styling. There is no evidence of a modern CMS or framework. Performance is moderate but could be improved with optimization and modernization. Accessibility and SEO are basic, with meta tags present but no advanced structured data or Open Graph tags. The site lacks HTTPS enforcement and security headers, which are critical technical risks. Overall, the technical infrastructure is functional but outdated and requires upgrades to meet current web standards and security best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dso-ostruzna.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dso-ostruzna.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.