Skip to main content

Security report for druku.lv

Druku.lv · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Druku.lv is a small Latvian printing services company focused on providing a wide range of printing and print-related services primarily in Riga. The business offers online order placement, free delivery within Riga, and printing consultations. The website is multilingual, supporting Latvian, English, and Russian, targeting a general audience interested in printing solutions. The company appears to have been founded around 2020, with consistent branding and an active social media presence across multiple platforms. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with common plugins such as Yoast SEO and Contact Form 7, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile-optimized and includes a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR requirements, although explicit privacy and terms of service pages are not found. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enabled but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. No WHOIS data was retrievable due to query limits, but the domain appears legitimate with privacy protection likely justified for a small business. Overall, the website is functional and professional but could improve in privacy transparency and security hardening.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching druku.lv

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
95
Security headers
30
Email security
55
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Druku.lv operates in the local printing services market in Riga, Latvia, offering online ordering and delivery services. Its competitive advantage lies in convenience and a broad service offering for printing needs. The business model is direct-to-consumer with online engagement and social media marketing. Revenue streams likely come from print orders and consulting services. The target customers are individuals and businesses in Riga requiring printing solutions. The company maintains a consistent brand image and leverages digital marketing tools but lacks formalized privacy and security documentation. Partnerships or subsidiaries are not evident from the website. Growth indicators include active social media and multilingual support, suggesting an intent to broaden reach.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture. HTTPS is properly implemented, ensuring encrypted communication. A consent management platform is integrated for GDPR compliance, reflecting awareness of privacy regulations. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No incident response or security policy information is provided, indicating limited formal security governance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The site uses standard WordPress plugins which should be regularly updated to mitigate risks. Overall, security practices are adequate for a small business but could be enhanced to improve resilience and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to improve transparency and compliance.
  2. Add security headers like Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against web attacks.
  3. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to reduce vulnerability exposure.
  4. Develop and communicate an incident response plan and security policy to strengthen security governance.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more detailed contact information including verified company emails.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Druku.lv
Description
Visplašākais drukas un printēšanas pakalpojumu klāsts Rīgā. Pasūtījumu pieņemšana online. Bezmaksas piegāde Rīgā. Printēšanas konstultācijas.
Key services
Printing services, Online order processing, Free delivery in Riga, Printing consultations
Content quality
basic
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, jQuery, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, Responsive Accordion and Collapse, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, InMobi Consent Manager
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Consent management platform for GDPR compliance

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
InMobi, Google Ads
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based small business site offering printing services in Riga, Latvia.
  2. Content is primarily in Latvian with language switch options for English and Russian.
  3. No privacy policy or terms of service pages explicitly found.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with a CMP from InMobi.
  5. Contact information includes a phone number and contact form but no email addresses explicitly found.
  6. Social media presence is strong with multiple platforms linked.
  7. No WHOIS data available due to query limit error.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; HTTPS is enabled.
  9. No signs of adult or unsafe content.
  10. No visible security or incident response policies.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Yoast SEO, Contact Form 7, and Google Analytics integration. It uses a responsive design with mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. Performance is moderate with video and image content. The site includes structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. Consent management is handled by InMobi CMP for GDPR compliance. No hosting provider details were identified. The site lacks advanced security headers and explicit privacy documentation. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a small business but has room for improvement in security and compliance documentation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with druku.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review druku.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.