Skip to main content

Security report for drukascentrs.lv

Baltijas Dizaina Drukas Centrs · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Baltijas Dizaina Drukas Centrs is a Latvian-based printing and design service provider operating since 2014. The company offers a broad range of services including design development, large format printing, digital printing, typography services, and presentation advertising. Their target audience primarily consists of businesses and organizations within the Baltic region seeking professional printing and design solutions. The website reflects a medium-sized enterprise with a consistent brand presence and client testimonials that enhance trustworthiness. Technically, the site is built on Joomla CMS with modern frameworks such as Helix3 and SP Page Builder, and it integrates Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and provides a cookie consent mechanism indicating GDPR compliance awareness. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS enforced, but lacks advanced security headers and explicit security policies. WHOIS data was unavailable due to query limits, limiting domain registration verification. Overall, the website presents a professional and functional digital presence suitable for its business domain.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drukascentrs.lv

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
67
Security headers
30
Email security
40
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a regional leader in printing and design services with a focus on quality and comprehensive offerings. Its business model revolves around service provision to corporate clients, including government entities and private companies, as evidenced by client logos and testimonials. The absence of direct contact emails on the homepage suggests a preference for controlled communication via contact forms. The company leverages social media channels like Facebook and LinkedIn to maintain engagement and brand visibility. The website content and structure indicate a stable business with a moderate size and a clear market niche. No indications of parent or subsidiary relationships were found. The company appears to maintain a good reputation with repeat clients and a broad service portfolio.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS, ensuring encrypted communication, and implements a cookie consent banner to comply with privacy regulations. However, it lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are recommended to mitigate common web vulnerabilities. No explicit security or incident response policies are published, and no dedicated security contact emails are provided. The site uses third-party scripts including Google Analytics, which introduces moderate user tracking. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and vulnerability disclosure program to improve transparency and trust.
  3. Add explicit security and incident response contact information to facilitate reporting and response.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience for all visitors.
  5. Regularly update Joomla CMS and all plugins to mitigate risks from known vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Baltijas Dizaina Drukas Centrs
Description
Baltijas Dizaina Drukas Centrs - strādājam kopš 2014. gada. Dizaina izstrāde, lielformāta druka, digitālā druka un tipogrāfijas pakalpojumi, prezentreklāma.
Key services
Dizaina izstrāde, Lielformāta druka, Digitālā druka, Tipogrāfijas pakalpojumi, Prezentreklāma
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Joomla, jQuery, Font Awesome, Google Fonts, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Helix3, SP Page Builder
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website uses Joomla CMS with SP Page Builder and Helix3 framework.
  2. Content is in Latvian with English alternate language available.
  3. Cookie consent banner present, indicating GDPR awareness.
  4. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on homepage; contact via form link.
  5. Social media presence on Facebook and LinkedIn.
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure policy.
  7. No terms of service page detected.
  8. WHOIS data unavailable due to query limit error.
  9. Website is well structured with clear service descriptions and client testimonials.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Joomla CMS using the Helix3 framework and SP Page Builder, which provide a modular and responsive design. It uses jQuery and Font Awesome for UI components and icons, and Google Fonts for typography. Google Analytics is integrated via gtag.js for visitor tracking. The site loads CSS and JS assets efficiently, though performance is moderate and could benefit from further optimization. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive layouts and mobile-specific logos. SEO is basic with meta tags and Open Graph tags present but could be enhanced with structured data. No hosting provider information was detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid for a medium-sized business but has room for modernization and performance improvements.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drukascentrs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drukascentrs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.