Skip to main content

Security report for drosjeutvalget.no

Drosjeutvalget · Government · Norway

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Drosjeutvalget.no is an official Norwegian government website representing a public committee established in 2022 to review and propose improvements to taxi regulation across Norway. The committee's work focuses on ensuring a comprehensive and fair taxi service nationwide, addressing regulatory, economic, and safety concerns. The website serves as an information portal for the public and stakeholders, providing updates, reports, and contact information. Technically, the site is built on WordPress with standard plugins and uses HTTPS with moderate performance and good mobile optimization. Security posture is adequate with no critical vulnerabilities detected, though improvements in security headers and cookie consent mechanisms are recommended. Overall, the site is trustworthy, professional, and aligned with government standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching drosjeutvalget.no

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention drosjeutvalget.no, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for drosjeutvalget.no right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website positions Drosjeutvalget as a government-appointed advisory body in the transportation sector, specifically focusing on taxi regulation. Its business model is non-commercial, providing regulatory recommendations and public consultations. The target audience includes government officials, taxi industry participants, and the general Norwegian public. The site leverages partnerships with official government domains and resources, enhancing credibility. Growth indicators include recent establishment and active publication of reports and hearings. The committee's strategic importance lies in shaping future taxi industry regulations in Norway.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and lack of a cookie consent mechanism indicate areas for improvement. No vulnerable libraries or insecure forms were detected. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, which could be enhanced to improve transparency and readiness. Overall, the site maintains a secure environment suitable for a government informational portal but should adopt additional best practices to strengthen defenses and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner to comply with GDPR and enhance user privacy transparency.
  3. Publish a security policy and incident response contact information to improve trust and readiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress core and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance contact information with phone numbers or contact forms to improve user engagement.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Drosjeutvalget
Description
Drosjeutvalget is a Norwegian government-appointed public committee established in May 2022 to review taxi regulation comprehensively. The committee evaluates measures to ensure a good taxi service nationwide, focusing on dependent groups, regulatory aspects like drive obligations, exclusive rights, and requirements for industry actors. It aims to propose a well-functioning taxi industry compliant with EEA agreements, ensuring customer safety, good working conditions, and economic transparency.
Key services
Regulatory review, Policy recommendations, Public consultation and hearings
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.3, jQuery, Plausible Analytics, Ninja Forms, Gutenberg Blocks
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
PHP-based CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of nonce and script integrity not explicitly visible but standard WordPress scripts used

Analytics and tracking

Services
Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Plausible Analytics
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Official Norwegian government-related website
  2. Clear focus on taxi regulation and public committee work
  3. No signs of malicious or suspicious activity
  4. Limited contact information but includes responsible editor email
  5. No cookie consent mechanism detected
  6. Use of modern WordPress CMS with standard plugins
  7. Minimal tracking with privacy-respecting analytics (Plausible)
  8. No visible security headers in HTML but HTTPS is enforced
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.8.3, utilizing jQuery, Ninja Forms, and Plausible Analytics for tracking. Hosting appears to be managed by Norwegian government infrastructure, ensuring reliability and compliance. The site uses modern CSS and responsive design techniques, providing good mobile usability and accessibility. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization. SEO metadata is present but minimal, suggesting potential for improved search visibility. No critical technical debt or risks were identified, but ongoing maintenance and security updates are essential to sustain operational integrity.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with drosjeutvalget.no. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review drosjeutvalget.no.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.