Skip to main content

Security report for dragon.cz

Dragon Internet a.s. · Telecommunications · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Dragon Internet a.s. is a well-established Czech internet service provider founded in 1997, offering a broad range of telecommunications services including high-speed internet via optical, microwave, and mobile networks, television services including Skylink, telephony, and technical support such as Apple device and PC servicing. The company targets both residential and business customers, positioning itself as a reliable and diversified ISP in the Czech market. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear navigation and relevant content tailored to its audience. Technically, the site employs modern tracking and marketing technologies such as Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and Targito, and integrates external services like Smartform.cz for form handling and Google Maps API for location services. The site is mobile optimized and accessible, with good SEO practices evident in meta tags and structured content. Security-wise, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure forms with CSRF tokens, but lacks explicit security headers and a published security or incident response policy. Privacy compliance is strong, with a comprehensive privacy policy, cookie consent mechanism, and GDPR adherence. Overall, the site scores well on content quality, technical implementation, security posture, privacy compliance, and business credibility, reflecting a mature digital presence. Recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and adding a vulnerability disclosure mechanism to further strengthen trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dragon.cz

This scan found 17 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
90
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Dragon Internet a.s. operates in the telecommunications sector, focusing on internet and TV services with additional offerings such as telephony and device servicing. The company leverages a multi-channel business model combining direct service provision with e-commerce via its linked e-shop domain. Its market positioning is that of an established mid-sized ISP with a diversified portfolio catering to both households and businesses. The company maintains a strong partnership ecosystem, including remote support via TeamViewer and marketing via Targito. Growth indicators include recent news updates and service expansions. The company’s digital presence supports customer engagement through social media and a customer portal. Strategic observations suggest a focus on service quality, customer support, and digital marketing to maintain competitive advantage in the Czech market.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced and secure form handling including CSRF tokens. Cookie consent is managed in compliance with GDPR, and tracking scripts are loaded asynchronously to minimize performance impact. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is published, which could hinder timely vulnerability reporting and response. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file is present, limiting transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be improved by adopting additional security best practices and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and facilitate vulnerability reporting.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible security research and disclosures.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries for vulnerabilities and update them promptly.
  5. Enhance user trust by providing more visible trust indicators such as certifications, customer testimonials, and compliance badges.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Dragon Internet a.s.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Dragon Internet a.s.
Description
Dragon Internet a.s. is a provider of internet services via optical, microwave, and mobile networks, offering internet, TV, Apple service, and PC service.
Key services
Internet, TV (including Skylink), Mobile and fixed telephony, Apple device servicing, PC servicing, E-shop
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Google Maps API, Smartform.cz, Targito marketing platform
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Consent management for cookies
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Secure contact form with CSRF token

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Targito
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Targito marketing platform, Facebook Pixel
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed and well-structured.
  2. Comprehensive cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  3. No direct company emails or phone numbers explicitly labeled found in HTML; contact is via form.
  4. Social media presence is strong with official Facebook, LinkedIn, and YouTube channels.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response contact found.
  6. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file detected.
  7. WHOIS data supports legitimacy and long-standing operation.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern technology stack including Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Targito marketing platform, Smartform.cz for form management, and Google Maps API for geolocation features. The site is responsive and optimized for mobile devices with multiple CSS stylesheets targeting various screen widths. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts to reduce blocking. The site lacks a detectable CMS, suggesting a custom or proprietary platform. Hosting details are limited but the registrar is REG-WEDOS, a known Czech provider. The site uses structured meta tags and Open Graph for SEO and social media integration. Technical risks include the absence of security headers and potential reliance on multiple third-party scripts which could introduce vulnerabilities if not managed properly. Opportunities exist to improve performance and security by consolidating scripts and implementing modern security standards.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dragon.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dragon.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.