Skip to main content

Security report for dracconsulting.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in SSL/TLS, Network security and 2 other checks.

Security score

52/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.dracconsulting.com is currently inaccessible, returning a 403 Forbidden error page that blocks access to any meaningful content. The domain WHOIS data is unavailable, indicating the domain may not be registered or is expired, which raises significant concerns about the legitimacy and operational status of the business. No metadata, structured data, or business information is present to provide insights into the company's operations or services. Technically, the site lacks any detectable technologies, scripts, or security headers, and no privacy or cookie policies are found, indicating a very low level of digital maturity and compliance. The security posture is poor due to the lack of HTTPS information and absence of security best practices. Overall, the site appears non-operational or improperly configured, posing a high risk for users and stakeholders.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  2. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dracconsulting.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
57
Security headers
45
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
52

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content and absence of WHOIS registration data, no reliable business intelligence can be derived. There is no evidence of market positioning, business model, or target audience. The domain's unregistered or expired status suggests the business may not be active or is in a transitional state. No partnerships or related domains are identified. The lack of contact information and trust indicators further diminishes business credibility.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is critically weak. The site is inaccessible with a 403 Forbidden error, which may be a result of misconfiguration or intentional blocking. No HTTPS or SSL/TLS information is available, and no security headers are detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and incident response contacts indicates non-compliance with common security and privacy standards such as GDPR. The missing WHOIS data adds to the suspicion of domain legitimacy. Overall, the site is not secure and does not follow best practices for protecting users or data.

Recommendations

  1. Register or renew the domain to ensure proper WHOIS data availability and legitimacy.
  2. Configure the web server to allow legitimate access or provide a user-friendly error page with contact information.
  3. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure communications.
  4. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  5. Publish clear contact information including business address, phone numbers, and emails to improve trust.
  6. Deploy security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  7. Establish an incident response contact channel (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  8. Improve website content quality and technical implementation for better user experience and SEO.
  9. Conduct a full security audit to identify and remediate vulnerabilities.
  10. Consider adding structured data and metadata to enhance search engine visibility and business credibility.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Website returns a 403 Forbidden error page indicating access is blocked or forbidden. No WAF vendor-specific challenge detected but content is blocked. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is inaccessible and returns a 403 Forbidden error page.
  2. No WHOIS registration data found for the domain.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No contact information or business details available on the page.
  5. No external links, forms, or scripts detected in the HTML content.
  6. No analytics or tracking technologies detected.
  7. No social media or email contacts found.
  8. Website content is minimal and blocked, preventing full analysis.
Technical notes

Notes

The website currently serves only a static 403 Forbidden error page with no dynamic content or scripts. No CMS, frameworks, or hosting provider information is detectable. The HTML is minimal and lacks meta tags beyond basic charset and viewport settings. There is no evidence of analytics, tracking, or advertising technologies. Mobile optimization and accessibility are poor due to the lack of content and responsive design elements. The absence of security headers and HTTPS information indicates a lack of modern web security practices. Overall, the technical infrastructure appears minimal or misconfigured, requiring significant improvements to support a functional and secure business website.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dracconsulting.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dracconsulting.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.