Skip to main content

Security report for dppcr.cz

Povodňový plán České republiky · Government · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website dppcr.cz serves as the official digital flood plan portal for the Czech Republic, providing comprehensive flood-related information, meteorological data, flood commission activities, and thematic maps. It targets government agencies, emergency responders, and public stakeholders involved in flood management. The site is well-structured with clear navigation and integrates links to national and European meteorological services, positioning itself as a key resource in national flood preparedness and response. Technically, the site uses standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript with jQuery, and Google Fonts. It employs HTTPS and Google Analytics for tracking, though lacks advanced security headers and cookie consent mechanisms. Mobile optimization is basic but functional, and accessibility features are minimal. The hosting and domain registration are consistent with a Czech government entity, enhancing trustworthiness. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS and absence of visible vulnerabilities or sensitive data exposure. However, it lacks explicit privacy and cookie policies, security headers, and incident response contact information, which are important for compliance and user trust. The use of Google Analytics without consent mechanisms may pose privacy compliance risks under GDPR. Overall, the website is a credible and authoritative government resource with good content quality and business credibility. To improve, it should implement privacy and cookie policies with consent, enhance security headers, and provide clear contact information for security and data protection matters. These steps will strengthen compliance, user trust, and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching dppcr.cz

This scan found 28 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The dppcr.cz domain represents a government-operated flood planning and information system for the Czech Republic. Its market position is that of an essential public service provider in the emergency management sector. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on public safety and information dissemination. Key services include flood monitoring, hydrological and meteorological data provision, flood commission coordination, and thematic mapping. The target audience includes government agencies, emergency services, and the general public interested in flood preparedness. The site integrates partnerships with national meteorological institutes and European weather services, indicating a collaborative ecosystem. Growth indicators are stable given the domain age and continuous updates. The lack of commercial elements and direct revenue streams aligns with its government service nature.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level with HTTPS enabled and no visible sensitive data exposure or vulnerable libraries. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces its defense-in-depth. The lack of privacy and cookie policies, as well as missing incident response contact information, indicates compliance gaps, especially under GDPR and NIS2 directives. No forms or inputs are present on the main page, reducing attack surface. The use of Google Analytics without consent mechanisms may expose the site to privacy risks. Overall, the security posture is adequate for an informational government site but requires enhancements to meet modern compliance and security standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate a Data Protection Officer to improve incident response readiness and compliance.
  4. Enhance mobile responsiveness and accessibility features to improve user experience and inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and analytics tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize tracking risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Povodňový plán České republiky
Description
Digitální povodňový plán (Digital Flood Plan) for the Czech Republic providing flood-related information, forecasts, activities, maps, and links to meteorological and hydrological services.
Key services
Flood warning and monitoring, Hydrological and meteorological data, Flood commission information, Flood maps and thematic maps, Links to national and European meteorological services, Flood information system (POVIS) and data editor
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Fonts (Open Sans), Google Analytics (gtag.js)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No inline sensitive data exposure
  • No visible vulnerable libraries
  • No forms collecting sensitive data on main page

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is an official government flood planning portal for the Czech Republic.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided on the analyzed page.
  4. Uses Google Analytics without visible cookie consent mechanism.
  5. No forms present on the main page; no data collection detected.
  6. Good use of HTTPS and modern fonts; moderate mobile optimization.
  7. Navigation is clear with structured menus and iframe content loading.
  8. No security headers detected in provided data; potential improvement area.
  9. No signs of suspicious or malicious content.
  10. WHOIS data consistent with website purpose and location.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using standard web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with jQuery. It uses Google Fonts for typography and Google Analytics for visitor tracking. The site employs iframe-based navigation and content loading, which may impact SEO and accessibility. Hosting is managed through a Czech registrar with DNS servers ns.forpsi.net and ns.forpsi.it, indicating local hosting infrastructure. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization. The absence of a CMS suggests a custom or static site architecture. Technical debt appears low but modernization opportunities include improving accessibility, SEO, and security header implementation. The use of asynchronous loading for analytics is a positive performance practice. Overall, the technical infrastructure is stable but could benefit from modernization to enhance performance and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 55/100Medium36 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with dppcr.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review dppcr.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.